<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[0.0.0.0 nodes]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi</p>
<p dir="auto">I have a lot of 0.0.0.0 generic nodes showing up at root level. Any idea what that is. I did not have them when I had the server running on Windows. Now it's running on linux.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/125/0.0.0.0-nodes</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 08:24:02 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/125.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:50:25 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 0.0.0.0 nodes on Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:30:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Based on config table content:</p>
<p dir="auto">Looks like a problem with active discovery. Difference between Windows and Linux is that on Windows if you try to ping address 0.0.0.0 you will get an error, but on Linux it will return normal reply from loopback interface. So probably you have address 0.0.0.0 in your active discovery configuration, and on Linux server constantly find additional nodes. Could you also send me content of address_lists table?<br />
 <br />
Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/572</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/572</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:30:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 0.0.0.0 nodes on Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:21:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">My db is 85Mb<br />
Can I leave something out or do your want it all?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/570</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/570</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jws]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:21:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 0.0.0.0 nodes on Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:26:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Looks very strange. Could you please send me a dump of your entire database (if it doesn't contain sensetive data) or at least content of 'config' table from database? You can use dump -at- <a href="http://netxms.org" rel="nofollow ugc">netxms.org</a> for sending info via email.<br />
Also, when you move NetXMS server from Windows to Linux, you just install new instance or move the existing database?</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/566</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/566</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:26:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 0.0.0.0 nodes on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:50:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">... and it seems that give problems with new units on the network. I jsut added a new switch.<br />
It did not turn up, så I add'ed it manually and got an error that it already exists.</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/smf/0000000000037-SS-10.23.2007-09.48.37AM.png" alt="SS-10.23.2007-09.48.37AM.png" class="img-markdown  img-fluid" width="497" height="734" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/562</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/562</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jws]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:50:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 0.0.0.0 nodes on Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:54:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Could you please post a screenshot?</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/558</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/558</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:54:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>