<![CDATA[Polling Definitions]]>hi,

how can i disable the agent polling for all the switches instead of checking it 1 by 1 ?
10x,
Lindeamon

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/1392/polling-definitionsRSS for NodeFri, 13 Nov 2026 10:36:30 GMTMon, 03 Oct 2011 14:33:11 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Polling Definitions on Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:55:59 GMT]]>It's definitely a bug so it will be fixed in 1.1.6.

Best regards,
Victor

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/6084https://forum.netxms.org/post/6084Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:55:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Polling Definitions on Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:50:19 GMT]]>thank you victor,

will this be repaired in the versions to come or should i remember this for the future ?

Best Regards,
Lindeamon

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/6082https://forum.netxms.org/post/6082Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:50:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Polling Definitions on Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:47:50 GMT]]>Hi!

Yes, it's a bug in NXSL interpreter. It erroneously interprets OID as floating point number. As a workaround, you can replace == with like operation:

return ($node->snmpOID like ".1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.516");

Best regards,
Victor

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/6081https://forum.netxms.org/post/6081Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:47:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Polling Definitions on Tue, 04 Oct 2011 07:36:16 GMT]]>here is the exact script:

sub main()
{
return ($node->snmpOID == ".1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.516");  //(this is the oid of the cisco 3750 switch)
}

now it bind all of the nodes having this oid but it also adds nodes whith this oid .1.3.6.1.4.1.789.2.3 (this is the oid of netapp fas270).

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/6080https://forum.netxms.org/post/6080Tue, 04 Oct 2011 07:36:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Polling Definitions on Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:21:46 GMT]]>@lindeamon said in Polling Definitions:

how can i disable the agent polling for all the switches instead of checking it 1 by 1 ?

Unfortunately it's not possible.

Best regards,
Victor

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/6075https://forum.netxms.org/post/6075Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:21:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Polling Definitions on Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:20:46 GMT]]>Could you please post exact script code and actual SNMP OID value? Script posted earlier looks correct, so I suppose some typo or similar error when defining OID.

Best regards,
Victor

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/6074https://forum.netxms.org/post/6074Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:20:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Polling Definitions on Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:51:37 GMT]]>sorry but i was wrong.deleting the trailing dot unbinded everything.back to square 1.

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/6073https://forum.netxms.org/post/6073Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:51:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Polling Definitions on Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:20:14 GMT]]>found the problem to my 2nd post and the problem was that the oid is written in the node's properties with a trailing dot as it should but the this dot confused the script.
still need an answer to my 1st post

10x,
lindeamon

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/6071https://forum.netxms.org/post/6071Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:20:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Polling Definitions on Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:58:23 GMT]]>i have created a container and added an auto bind rule as follows:

sub main()
{
return ($node->snmpOID == "<oid number>");
}

but other nodes with different oid's were binded too,how come ?

10x,
Lindeamon

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/6069https://forum.netxms.org/post/6069Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:58:23 GMT