<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Business Services Explanation]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">Would it be possible to shed more light on Business Services. An example would be much appreciated.</p>
<p dir="auto">Regards<br />
Dan</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/1602/business-services-explanation</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 18:30:31 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/1602.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:38:01 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Business Services Explanation on Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:03:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">When SLA monitoring will be available</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/11645</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/11645</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[phonix786]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:03:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Business Services Explanation on Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:04:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thank you Victor. I guess it should be considered then as "work in progress".<br />
Looking forward to seeing how it unveil.</p>
<p dir="auto">Regards,<br />
Dan</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/6896</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/6896</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DanG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:04:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Business Services Explanation on Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:51:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi!</p>
<p dir="auto">Business services is a first step towards implementing SLA monitoring. Main idea is to give possibility to define services with criteria to determine availability of those services. Each business service can contain subordinate business services and/or checks used to determine service status. Business service can have only two statuses - up or down. If at least one subordinate service is down or at least one check reporting failure service is considered down. Availability for current day, week, and month calculated automatically and displayed in console. Also, there are ready to use report for service availability for any given period.<br />
In it's current form configuring business services is very time consuming task. I'm thinking of possible ways to simplify this task. Also, in our plans is to introduce new object type - SLA (Service Level Agreement) to allow automatic SLA violation checking.</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/6895</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/6895</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:51:37 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>