<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Host dependencies]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Is there the possibility to have a feature like "Host Dependencies" that is found in Nagios?<br />
I have many nodes that depend on some core switches but I would like to receive alerts only from the core switch that is down and not from the nodes that dependent on it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/1729/host-dependencies</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 09:35:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/1729.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:07:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Host dependencies on Wed, 23 May 2012 12:24:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">Could there be timing issues with this approach? If you have 10 nodes dependant on 1 switch, all with a status interval of 1 minute, you're bound to have some nodes going down before the switch node.</p>
<p dir="auto">If it's turned in to a full-fledged rule, it'd be really cool if the rule could trigger the status (or more generally, any random DCI?) to be checked before evaluation; but perhaps to prevent it from bogging down the event processor make this optional.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/7466</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/7466</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bdefloo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:24:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Host dependencies on Tue, 22 May 2012 18:25:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">This can be done with scripts in event processing policy. You can determine switch where host is connected, and ignore event if it is down. I will also add a feature request for implementing it as standard event correlation rule.</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/7457</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/7457</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:25:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>