<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Unable to retrieve forwarding database]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello there! We have been trying out NetXMS and are mostly very impressed! Keep up the good work!</p>
<p dir="auto">That being said, we are having an issue showing topology information. It seems that this stems from a problem retrieving the forwarding database from a Force10 switch. If I attempt to show the forwarding table, it is always empty.</p>
<p dir="auto">It seems from the source code that you are retrieving as follows:<br />
    node-&gt;CallSnmpEnumerate(_T(".1.3.6.1.2.1.17.4.3.1.1"), FDBHandler, fdb);<br />
However, that is dot1dTpFdbAddress which seems to only contain the forwarding information for the default VLAN. For us, that OID is empty on those particular switches.<br />
It seems like I am missing something.</p>
<p dir="auto">According to the documentation that I have read, it seems that we need dot1qTpFdbPort (.1.3.6.1.2.1.17.7.1.2.2.1.2) to retrieve the full forwarding table for non-default VLANs. If I walk that part of the tree, I see values that appear to be correct for building the FDB.</p>
<p dir="auto">On other switches that we have, such as 3Com, this behavior seems to be confirmed... The dot1dTpFdbTable contains a subset (or none) of the entries needed to complete the FDB, but the dot1qFdbTable seems to be more complete.</p>
<p dir="auto">Am I missing something for how this should work?</p>
<p dir="auto">Any thoughts on how we can get this topology mapping to work properly for us?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for your help!</p>
<p dir="auto">-- Jared</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/1787/unable-to-retrieve-forwarding-database</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 14:50:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/1787.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 12:15:12 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Unable to retrieve forwarding database on Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:24:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi!</p>
<p dir="auto">Your findings are correct. I'm personally only encounter switches reporting full FDB via dot1dTpFdbTable, but using dot1qTpFdbTable when possible seems more correct. I'll fix that for next release.</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/7746</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/7746</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:24:22 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>