<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[stack ports]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">hi victor,</p>
<p dir="auto">i have discovered my dell power connect with the driver and i saw that the 10gb ports which are stack ports are in an unknown state.<br />
bug ?</p>
<p dir="auto">Best Regards,<br />
Lindeamon</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/1843/stack-ports</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 11:49:50 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/1843.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:41:12 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to stack ports on Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:29:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">hi victor,</p>
<p dir="auto">i looked at the switches and i found that there is a difference between stack ports an 10gb ports.<br />
there are module sockets for either 10gb uplink or stack ports and the module attached is for stack ports therefor the status indication of the switches are correct.<br />
i was not familiar with this configuration which is different from cisco, hence my mistake</p>
<p dir="auto">Best Regards,<br />
Lindeamon</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/8046</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/8046</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lindeamon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:29:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to stack ports on Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:00:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi!</p>
<p dir="auto">Switch reports interface operational status as 2 (down) for 2 of them and 6 (notPresent) for other two on each unit. NetXMS server translates "notPresent" state into UNKNOWN status, this is why you see some of 10G interfaces as unknown. It's a question if this is a correct interpretation of interface state, or it should be translated into CRITICAL status, as for DOWN state.</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/8038</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/8038</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 07:00:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to stack ports on Sun, 29 Jul 2012 10:25:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">hi victor,<br />
attached is the output you have requested</p>
<p dir="auto">Best Regards,<br />
Lindeamon</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><a href="/assets/uploads/files/smf/0000000000841-netxms_opticsw_stack.txt">netxms_opticsw_stack.txt</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/8033</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/8033</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lindeamon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 10:25:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to stack ports on Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:13:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">will do coming this sunday</p>
<p dir="auto">Best Regards,<br />
Lindeamon</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/8024</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/8024</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[lindeamon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 19:13:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to stack ports on Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:17:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Either bug, or switch really does not provide state for these ports. Can you do nxsnmpwalk on .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2 and send output to me?</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/8008</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/8008</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:17:10 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>