<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[1.2.4 баги, странности.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">[12.11.2012 10:30:28] **** Poll request sent to server ****<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28] Poll request accepted<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28] Starting status poll for node N_Omskaya_64_3p<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/2<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/1<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/1<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28] Checking SNMP agent connectivity<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/4<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/5<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/4<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/3<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/3<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/2<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/5<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/6<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/7<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/6<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/7<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/9<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/8<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/8<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/9<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/10<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/10<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/11<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/11<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/12<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/12<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/13<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/13<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/14<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/14<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/15<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/15<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/16<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/16<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/17<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Finished status poll on interface 1/17<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]    Starting status poll on interface 1/18<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:28]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Finished status poll on interface 1/18<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Starting status poll on interface 1/19<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Finished status poll on interface 1/19<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Starting status poll on interface 1/20<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Finished status poll on interface 1/20<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Starting status poll on interface 1/21<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Finished status poll on interface 1/21<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Starting status poll on interface 1/22<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Finished status poll on interface 1/22<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Starting status poll on interface 1/23<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Finished status poll on interface 1/23<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Starting status poll on interface 1/24<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Finished status poll on interface 1/24<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Starting status poll on interface 1/25<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Finished status poll on interface 1/25<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Starting status poll on interface 1/26<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Finished status poll on interface 1/26<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Starting status poll on interface 1/27<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Finished status poll on interface 1/27<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Starting status poll on interface 1/28<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Finished status poll on interface 1/28<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]    Starting status poll on interface 802.1Q Encapsulation Tag 0001<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:29]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
...<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:33]    Starting status poll on interface System<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:33]       Current interface status is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:33]       Retrieving interface status from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:33]       Interface status retrieved from SNMP agent<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:33]       Interface is NORMAL for 16 polls (1 poll required for status change)<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:33]       Interface status after poll is NORMAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:33]    Finished status poll on interface System<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:33] Node is connected<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:33] Finished status poll for node N_Omskaya_64_3p<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:33] Node status after poll is CRITICAL<br />
[12.11.2012 10:30:33] **** Poll completed successfully ****</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Не разрешается событие падения автоматически.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/2017/1.2.4-баги-странности.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 22:34:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/2017.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:36:09 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:57:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Мне как программисту нынешнее поведение скриптов трансформации казалось логичным <img src="https://forum.netxms.org/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=72b86a538fc" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:1.4em;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /> Однако данное предложение думаю действительно уменьшит количество недопониманий и и ошибок. Сделал что если скрипт не возвращает значения или возвращает null, то значение DCI не изменится.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/9254</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/9254</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 09:57:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:27:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Гм... Ну по мне так это вполне нормальное поведение...<br />
Если событие удовлетворяет заданным условиям, то True, если нет - False... так как в True задано return 500, он и возвращает 500, а в False - ниче не прописано.... следовательно Null.<br />
Но как там.. о вкусах не спорят ))</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/9233</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/9233</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kozlov_ao]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:27:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:22:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Скрипты трансформации имеют небольшой недочет в логике.</p>
<p dir="auto">скрипт ниже вернет 500 если значение больше 1000 и 0 для все остальных значений.</p>
<pre><code>if ($1&gt;1000)
return 500;
</code></pre>
<p dir="auto">скрипт ниже отработает как и ожидалось, вернет 500 для значений выше 1000 и оригинальное значение если меньше.</p>
<pre><code>if ($1&gt;1000)
return 500;
else
return $1;
</code></pre>
<p dir="auto">это или исправить или большими буквами описать этот нюанс в мануале. Данное поведение тянеться и с ранних версий и уже на форуме была темка где я предлагал нижний скрипт в качестве решения.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/9091</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/9091</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SKYnv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:22:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:54:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">dashboards<br />
tube/bar chart без множителей для значений работают.<br />
tube chart имеет легенду от bar chart</p>
<p dir="auto">да и вообще все кроме line chart работает без множителей.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/9082</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/9082</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SKYnv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 04:54:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Fri, 07 Dec 2012 04:44:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">по прежнему попытка записать кирилицу в UTF через nxmc приводит к</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">[07-Dec-2012 10:29:26] SQL query failed (Query = "SELECT var_value FROM config WHERE var_name=?"): Commands out of sync; you can't run this command now</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">то есть к невозможности записать после этого в базу вообще что либо. Например попытка задать русское описание event. Хотя например написание комментария к alarm не вызывает никаких проблем.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/9054</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/9054</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SKYnv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 04:44:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:34:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Виктор, свежий backtrace</p>
<pre><code>(gdb) core netxmsd.core
Core was generated by `netxmsd'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
#0  0x0000000803782a7c in ?? ()
(gdb) backtrace
#0  0x0000000803782a7c in ?? ()
#1  0x000000080381fd3b in ?? ()
#2  0x00000008038221fc in ?? ()
#3  0xffffffdf00000001 in ?? ()
#4  0xffffffffffffffff in ?? ()
#5  0x00000000ffffffff in ?? ()
#6  0x000000080351ba50 in ?? ()
#7  0x000000080351ba78 in ?? ()
#8  0x00000000000001a8 in ?? ()
#9  0x000000080351adf5 in ?? ()
#10 0x000000082c21d100 in ?? ()
#11 0x000000080e85b000 in ?? ()
#12 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
#13 0x00000008035163f1 in ?? ()
#14 0x00000000000001d7 in ?? ()
#15 0x000000080e38ed60 in ?? ()
#16 0x000000080e85b000 in ?? ()
#17 0x0000000801789308 in ?? ()
#18 0x00000000000001d7 in ?? ()
#19 0x000000080e38ed60 in ?? ()
#20 0x0000000803c07400 in ?? ()
#21 0x00000008017979f9 in ?? ()
#22 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
#23 0x0000000803c0b800 in ?? ()
#24 0x0000000803c0b808 in ?? ()
#25 0x0000000803510274 in ?? ()
#26 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
#27 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
#28 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
#29 0x0000000000000007 in ?? ()
#30 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
#31 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
Cannot access memory at address 0x7fffff8fb000
(gdb)
</code></pre>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/9021</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/9021</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SKYnv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:34:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:07:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/victor" aria-label="Profile: victor">@<bdi>victor</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/8989">1.2.4 баги, странности.</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Попробовал у себя - не получается повторить. После удаления цепочки сообщения об ошибке не появляются больше. Может есче какие-то особенности есть?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">поэкспериментирую</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/8991</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/8991</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SKYnv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:07:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:17:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Попробовал у себя - не получается повторить. После удаления цепочки сообщения об ошибке не появляются больше. Может есче какие-то особенности есть?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/8989</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/8989</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:17:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Fri, 23 Nov 2012 04:56:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/victor" aria-label="Profile: victor">@<bdi>victor</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/8983">1.2.4 баги, странности.</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/skynv" aria-label="Profile: skynv">@<bdi>skynv</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/8966">1.2.4 баги, странности.</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">nxagentd -h бесконечный цикл.<br />
freebsd</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">UNICODE или обычный? С UNICODE похоже проблем много еще...</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">unicode ))</p>
<p dir="auto">вот такая вот странность.<br />
Создаем новый Buisness service-&gt;create node link-&gt;create service check script-&gt;некий скрипт, пусть будет заведомо ошибочным. Дожидаемся сообщения об ошибке. Удаляем всю цепочку. Теперь сообщение об ошибке данного несуществующего скрипта будет падать постоянно.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Script (ServiceCheck::test::39416) execution error: Error 11 in line 3: Function not found</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/8987</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/8987</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SKYnv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 04:56:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:28:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/skynv" aria-label="Profile: skynv">@<bdi>skynv</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/8966">1.2.4 баги, странности.</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">nxagentd -h бесконечный цикл.<br />
freebsd</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">UNICODE или обычный? С UNICODE похоже проблем много еще...</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/8983</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/8983</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:28:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:04:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">nxagentd -h бесконечный цикл.<br />
freebsd</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/8966</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/8966</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SKYnv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:04:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:09:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/victor" aria-label="Profile: victor">@<bdi>victor</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/8919">1.2.4 баги, странности.</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Т.е. остался аларм? А как выглядит event processing policy?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">стандартная.</p>
<p dir="auto">подумав тут, была на выходных такая ситуация.<br />
сам сервер сидит в подстети 1.х<br />
еще имеются 5.х, 6.х и 7.х имело место нарушение маршрутизации, то есть гейт из первой подстеи в эти три падал. Видимо те коммутаторы что падали в это время и остались "зависшими", хотя с другой стороны тогда бы наверно все считались упавшими. или может евент шторм такую шутку сыграл.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/8927</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/8927</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[SKYnv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:09:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 1.2.4 баги, странности. on Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:31:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Т.е. остался аларм? А как выглядит event processing policy?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/8919</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/8919</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:31:46 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>