<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Network Dependencies]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello all.</p>
<p dir="auto">I have started looking at configuring rules in the event policy to minimise the number of emails that are generated when a remote site goes down.<br />
I have used the situation feature to accomplish this and it appears to work well.  See image for an example.<br />
<img src="http://wambiit.freesitespace.net/dependencies.jpg" alt="" class="img-markdown  img-fluid" /></p>
<p dir="auto">Rule1 is the site router.<br />
Rule 2 is the site switch<br />
Rule 3 are access points connected to the switch.</p>
<p dir="auto">I am just wondering if this is the best way to overcome this problem or is there another way?</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks in advance for any reply posts.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/321/network-dependencies</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 11:05:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/321.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 01:18:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Network Dependencies on Fri, 02 May 2008 12:22:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Yes, it's a best way - it's what situations was designed for.</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/1559</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/1559</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 12:22:38 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>