<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[SNMP pool of multiple devices under same IP but with different SNMP port]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Ability to have multiple nodes with same public IP, but pooling using different ports (SNMP...).<br />
Currently this causes node save IP conflict error.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/4507/snmp-pool-of-multiple-devices-under-same-ip-but-with-different-snmp-port</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 09:45:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/4507.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 17:46:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to SNMP pool of multiple devices under same IP but with different SNMP port on Sat, 10 Sep 2016 18:21:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">I got similar requests from other users too. I'm currently considering adding "exclude from topology" option for nodes - then all topology functionality will be turned off, but node will be checked in status and conf poll using primary name and data collection will work.</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/20913</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/20913</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 18:21:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to SNMP pool of multiple devices under same IP but with different SNMP port on Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:54:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tomaskir" aria-label="Profile: tomaskir">@<bdi>tomaskir</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/20889">SNMP pool of multiple devices under same IP but with different SNMP port</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">IP address uniqueness is one of the basic concepts in NetXMS... I am pretty sure internally the code also relies on single IP = single device a lot.<br />
Victor will however have to comment more on this.</p>
<p dir="auto">Simply put a Raspberry Pi, or similar $30 Linux machine into the network, and use it as a proxy.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I believe so and I agree with you.<br />
But since it is a small network with one router and one local switch, i should not buy another device ($5 or whatever) for this simple local network and basic SNMP monitoring.<br />
This is simple NetXMS software limitation then, and my request/proposal is to change the behavior and single IP = single device. I also understand that this is core of the system possibly.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/20890</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/20890</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hkusulja]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:54:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to SNMP pool of multiple devices under same IP but with different SNMP port on Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:41:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">IP address uniqueness is one of the basic concepts in NetXMS... I am pretty sure internally the code also relies on single IP = single device a lot.<br />
Victor will however have to comment more on this.</p>
<p dir="auto">Simply put a Raspberry Pi, or similar $30 Linux machine into the network, and use it as a proxy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/20889</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/20889</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tomaskir]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:41:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to SNMP pool of multiple devices under same IP but with different SNMP port on Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:32:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I currently use zoning and it works, which I am trying to avoid.<br />
I do not have devices where I can install NetXMS agent so I can't use proxy.</p>
<p dir="auto">Enabling simple that IP address must not be unique would resolve the issue.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/20888</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/20888</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hkusulja]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:32:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to SNMP pool of multiple devices under same IP but with different SNMP port on Wed, 07 Sep 2016 13:50:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">You have 2 opions:</p>
<ol>
<li>
<p dir="auto">if this is multiple customers/sites separate them into zones.<br />
You can research how zones work and what they are used for in the documentation.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p dir="auto">If you dont want to use Zoning, simply place a proxy in the network, and proxy SNMP over that proxy to all local devices.</p>
</li>
</ol>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/20887</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/20887</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[tomaskir]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 13:50:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to SNMP pool of multiple devices under same IP but with different SNMP port on Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:54:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I have the same issue. I have many devices behind NAT firewall and security rules does not allow or is technically impossible to make persistent VPN connections to all clients and all networks all the time. Also some IP networks or device IP can be the same in a different monitoring systems.</p>
<p dir="auto">I like the option to use custom SNMP port, but just like CactiEz I need to just add many nodes with the same IP addresses and networks, separate them in isolated regions and monitor them. In the current implementation I can use this great system only to monitor one site and this is just not enough.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/20884</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/20884</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[nuspedmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 12:54:48 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>