<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Removing Nodes from Templates and DCI Removal]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">I just encountered a rather odd issue when I manually removed a node from a template and asked it to remove the DCIs.<br />
The result was that not all DCIs from the template were actually removed - but two out of three DCIs from a completely different template were.</p>
<p dir="auto">Not sure if anyone here has ever seen such a behaviour before?</p>
<p dir="auto">Cheers</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/4602/removing-nodes-from-templates-and-dci-removal</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 21:23:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/4602.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 02:39:19 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Removing Nodes from Templates and DCI Removal on Wed, 27 Jul 2016 04:24:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Sure were.<br />
I wasn't aware that the server crashing, deleting of wrong DCIs and DCI duplication were all related to the same underlying problem with instances.</p>
<p dir="auto">I just upgraded to version 2.0.5 and did another round of template consolidation, which included removing a number of instances from templates and the system has been stable with no odd DCI deletions either.</p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks Victor!</p>
<p dir="auto">Cheers</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/20486</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/20486</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tursiops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 04:24:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Removing Nodes from Templates and DCI Removal on Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:07:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">were those DCIs instance discovery DCIs? If yes, 2.0.5 most likely will fix it - possible deletion of wrong DCIs when deleting instance discovery DCIs was one of the bugs fixed in instance discovery code.</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/20464</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/20464</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:07:55 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>