<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Critical status for node without critical alarms or down interfaces]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">I see two nodes (both are Juniper MX-960) with critical status and without critical alarms or down interfaces. How can it be? What can I check?</p>
<p dir="auto">I use NetXMS version 2.0.6 on ALT Linux 8.0 with PostgreSQL 9.5. Maybe this issue is linked to <a href="https://dev.raden.solutions/issues/1289" rel="nofollow ugc">https://dev.raden.solutions/issues/1289</a>, which looks like obvious bug, so I didn't ask about it here?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/4695/critical-status-for-node-without-critical-alarms-or-down-interfaces</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 09:23:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/4695.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 07:09:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Critical status for node without critical alarms or down interfaces on Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:57:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hello, same problem here, only with Cisco C2960 and C3850 devices. (NetXMS 2.0.6 + MySQL)</p>
<p dir="auto">EDIT: Fixed, it was caused by change of interfaces. Some ports were expected as DOWN and they went UP <img src="https://forum.netxms.org/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=72b86a538fc" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:1.4em;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":-)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/20919</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/20919</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mystery]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:57:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Critical status for node without critical alarms or down interfaces on Mon, 12 Sep 2016 04:57:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/victor" aria-label="Profile: victor">@<bdi>victor</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/20912">Critical status for node without critical alarms or down interfaces</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">could it be that you have DCI marked as "used for status calculation"?</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I did not created DCIs except default. Both Junipers has nothing on 'Last Values' tabs. Can I see something else?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/20916</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/20916</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[enp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 04:57:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Critical status for node without critical alarms or down interfaces on Sat, 10 Sep 2016 18:19:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi,</p>
<p dir="auto">could it be that you have DCI marked as "used for status calculation"?</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/20912</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/20912</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 18:19:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Critical status for node without critical alarms or down interfaces on Fri, 09 Sep 2016 07:32:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">No, this problem is not linked to PostgreSQL,  I have the same problem with MariaDB</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/20907</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/20907</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[enp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 07:32:25 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>