<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[NetXMS backups - what is the general consensus?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Now that I have enough things added that I would not want to have to start again - what is the consensus on backups?</p>
<p dir="auto">Just the DB? and if so, is there a standard command to use - or a sequence of commands?</p>
<p dir="auto">The closest I found was this<br />
<a href="https://www.netxms.org/forum/installation/netxms-server-backup-and-restore-process/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.netxms.org/forum/installation/netxms-server-backup-and-restore-process/</a></p>
<p dir="auto">So for my postgres on Windows, it would be</p>
<ol>
<li>Backup netxmsd.conf / nxagentd.conf</li>
<li>Backup /netxms (keep everything - much easier)</li>
<li>Backup database (pg_dump)</li>
<li>Backup copy of DB and NetXMS install files (for bare metal restore)</li>
</ol>
<p dir="auto">Restore procedure is:</p>
<ol>
<li>Restore or recreate config</li>
<li>Restore files, if any</li>
<li>Restore database</li>
<li>Check data consistency: "nxdbmgr check"</li>
</ol>
<p dir="auto">Bare Metal restore:</p>
<ol>
<li>Build server</li>
<li>Install DB - same DB as old</li>
<li>Install NetXMS - same version as old</li>
<li>Restore config</li>
<li>Restore DB</li>
<li>Check data consistency: "nxdbmgr check"</li>
</ol>
<p dir="auto">All good!!</p>
<p dir="auto">Is this what others are doing?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/5984/netxms-backups-what-is-the-general-consensus</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 22:11:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/5984.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 07:00:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to NetXMS backups - what is the general consensus? on Mon, 10 Jun 2019 09:31:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">We have Vsphere HA cluster and Commvault snapshot based backups.</p>
<p dir="auto"></p><div class="card col-md-9 col-lg-6 position-relative link-preview p-0">



<a href="https://www.veeam.com/blog/why-snapshots-alone-are-not-backups.html" title="VMware Snapshots vs Backups: What's The Difference?">
<img src="https://www.veeam.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/img01-4.png" class="card-img-top not-responsive" style="max-height:15rem" alt="Link Preview Image" />
</a>



<div class="card-body">
<h5 class="card-title">
<a class="text-decoration-none" href="https://www.veeam.com/blog/why-snapshots-alone-are-not-backups.html">
VMware Snapshots vs Backups: What's The Difference?
</a>
</h5>
<p class="card-text line-clamp-3">What's the difference between VMware snapshots and backups? Learn why snapshots alone are not enough to protect your data from harm in this Veeam blog post.</p>
</div>
<a href="https://www.veeam.com/blog/why-snapshots-alone-are-not-backups.html" class="card-footer text-body-secondary small d-flex gap-2 align-items-center lh-2">



<img src="https://img.veeam.com/favicon/favicon-16x16.ico" alt="favicon" class="not-responsive overflow-hiddden" style="max-width:21px;max-height:21px" />































<p class="d-inline-block text-truncate mb-0">Veeam Software Official Blog <span class="text-secondary">(www.veeam.com)</span></p>
</a>
</div><p></p>
<p dir="auto">Unfortunately, we do not have the Commvault PostgreSQL agent which means a DIY option.</p>
<p dir="auto">I have pg_dump working producing compressed files in Directory format so happy enough with that. *** my daily safety net *** </p>
<p dir="auto">My uncompressed version produced the same size backup as nxdbmgr export - so happy enough with that as well.</p>
<p dir="auto">Having a just-in-case seems like a good idea and since I will be smash testing my VM (and host) to see how "recoverable" it is - I want to make sure I really can recover it - no matter what!!</p>
<p dir="auto">I will start with a snapshot though after first stopping NetXMS and PG <img src="https://forum.netxms.org/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=72b86a538fc" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:1.4em;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /> - my ultimate fall back.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/25908</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/25908</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 09:31:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to NetXMS backups - what is the general consensus? on Mon, 10 Jun 2019 02:52:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">We are backing the entire VM up using Veeam, which worked quite well for us so far.<br />
As we are running Hyper-V clusters, if the host fails the VM is moved across automatically, there is no real bare metal restore.<br />
If needed, we could run up another host and restore the VM to that.<br />
And yes, part of any restore is indeed to run a database consistency check.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/25901</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/25901</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tursiops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 02:52:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>