<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Cisco CBS switches driver]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Cisco CBS series switches are the successor to the Cisco Small Business series switches.<br />
I think it would probably make sense to use CISCO-SB driver for these switches.<br />
Do you want some snmpwalk output or similar to help add support for these switches to the CISCO-SB driver?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/7400/cisco-cbs-switches-driver</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 09:05:02 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/7400.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 16:43:02 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cisco CBS switches driver on Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:09:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Yes, the VLANs are reported against the switchports correctly with both GENERIC and CISCO-SB driver [here I am discussing CBS350-24FP-4X].<br />
The "Location" field is no longer populated once switching to CISCO-SB. I think this is not a problem, with GENERIC it shows the location as "0/1/0/29" for interface te1/0/1, I am not sure that location is correct.</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/smf/0000000005724-ksnip_20220613-110728.png" alt="ksnip_20220613-110728.png" class="img-markdown  img-fluid" width="1055" height="87" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/31576</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/31576</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[troffasky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:09:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cisco CBS switches driver on Tue, 07 Jun 2022 06:49:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Does it report VLANs correctly with GENERIC driver? If not, does forcing CISCO-SB helps?</p>
<p dir="auto">VLAN information is most common place where custom driver is required.</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/31512</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/31512</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 06:49:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cisco CBS switches driver on Mon, 06 Jun 2022 10:37:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The driver is detected as GENERIC and the Node type is Unknown.<br />
But...it actually does an OK job anyway as GENERIC as it finds the name/version/Serial, so I think this is really just a cosmetic issue.<br />
I have overridden the driver with the CISCO-SB one and done a configuration (full) poll.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/31509</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/31509</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[troffasky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 10:37:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cisco CBS switches driver on Thu, 02 Jun 2022 11:58:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">But how it goes currently, it gets detected with CISCO-GENERIC driver?</p>
<p dir="auto">You can actually force CISCO-SB by setting custom attribute snmp.driver to CISCO-SB. If so, would all information get collected correctly or would there be any issues?</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/31486</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/31486</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Filipp Sudanov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 11:58:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cisco CBS switches driver on Thu, 02 Jun 2022 11:10:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Hi troffasky<br />
Possibly share with your supplier many will make a loan unit if the device is not to expensive.<br />
Regards Dawid</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/31485</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/31485</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dawid Kellerman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 11:10:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cisco CBS switches driver on Wed, 01 Jun 2022 15:13:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Not at this time unfortunately as they belong to customers and are deployed on customer sites. When I get one in my hands I will provide access.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/31481</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/31481</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[troffasky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 15:13:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cisco CBS switches driver on Wed, 01 Jun 2022 11:15:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Is there any chance that you could provide remote access to such a device to our developers? That would be the easiest way to develop the driver.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/31479</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/31479</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Filipp Sudanov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2022 11:15:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>