<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[new desktop client - unbound nodes in infrastructure outside the folder tree]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I'm still primarily using the legacy console due to muscle memory and preferring how the object browser is not split into the different modules/perspectives like the new console. But I still load it up and check in on it every release to see how its coming along.</p>
<p dir="auto">One thing I've noticed is that nodes discovered in the network that are not bound under a container in 'infrastructure services' show up outside of the infrastructure service folder heirachy.  Can't see a way to unbind them (as they have no parent container) if I don't want to track them. </p>
<p dir="auto">If I bind them to a container "unmonitored" they then move there and disappear.  Does this mean there should be a catch-all container for all nodes?  Or is this a bug?</p>
<p dir="auto">The legacy console does not show unbound nodes anywhere (other than under their subnets in 'entire network').</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/smf/0000000006642-unbound-nodes.png" alt="unbound-nodes.png" class="img-markdown  img-fluid" width="290" height="504" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/7931/new-desktop-client-unbound-nodes-in-infrastructure-outside-the-folder-tree</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 06:16:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.netxms.org/topic/7931.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 02:11:34 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to new desktop client - unbound nodes in infrastructure outside the folder tree on Wed, 15 May 2024 02:18:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/victor" aria-label="Profile: victor">@<bdi>victor</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/33487">new desktop client - unbound nodes in infrastructure outside the folder tree</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I just updated client application so that nodes without parent objects in infrastructure tree are not shown as root level objects. This change will be part of release 5.0.3.<br />
Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Thanks Victor, look forward to it.</p>
<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/filipp-sudanov" aria-label="Profile: filipp-sudanov">@<bdi>filipp-sudanov</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/33485">new desktop client - unbound nodes in infrastructure outside the folder tree</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Not sure why this is happening. Can you run the script I've shared manually (via Execute Script from context menu) on a couple of nodes which we bound to that container, but should not and share the output.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Hi Filip, attached is a screenshot of executing the script on a node that had an existing parent.  It always seems to return true whether on a node that has no other parent or an existing node.</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/smf/0000000006654-Screenshot_2024-05-15_114007.png" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-15 114007.png" class="img-markdown  img-fluid" width="880" height="651" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/33497</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/33497</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[normalcy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 02:18:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to new desktop client - unbound nodes in infrastructure outside the folder tree on Sat, 11 May 2024 07:59:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I just updated client application so that nodes without parent objects in infrastructure tree are not shown as root level objects. This change will be part of release 5.0.3.</p>
<p dir="auto">Best regards,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/33487</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/33487</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[victor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2024 07:59:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to new desktop client - unbound nodes in infrastructure outside the folder tree on Fri, 10 May 2024 17:47:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Not sure why this is happening. Can you run the script I've shared manually (via Execute Script from context menu) on a couple of nodes which we bound to that container, but should not and share the output.</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/33485</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/33485</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Filipp Sudanov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 17:47:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to new desktop client - unbound nodes in infrastructure outside the folder tree on Wed, 08 May 2024 05:38:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/filipp-sudanov" aria-label="Profile: filipp-sudanov">@<bdi>filipp-sudanov</bdi></a> said in <a href="/post/33437">new desktop client - unbound nodes in infrastructure outside the folder tree</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Currently you can have "Unbound stuff" container somewhere with this auto-bind script, it will pick objects that are not present in any other containers:</p>
<p dir="auto">for(p : $object.parents) {<br />
  println(classof(p));<br />
  if ((classof(p) == "Container") and <a href="http://p.id" rel="nofollow ugc">p.id</a> != $<a href="http://container.id" rel="nofollow ugc">container.id</a>) return false;<br />
}<br />
return true;</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Thanks Filipp.  </p>
<p dir="auto">I tried this script however it seems to pickup and autobind all nodes over time, not just those nodes outside the infrastructure services tree with no parent container.  </p>
<p dir="auto">eg: attached an example of it filtered down to some APs that are already in parent containers and still trigger the autobind event.</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><img src="/assets/uploads/files/smf/0000000006648-bound-node-autobinding-to-unbound-container.png" alt="bound-node-autobinding-to-unbound-container.png" class="img-markdown  img-fluid" width="1889" height="823" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/33463</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/33463</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[normalcy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 05:38:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to new desktop client - unbound nodes in infrastructure outside the folder tree on Fri, 03 May 2024 09:10:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">It's planned to fix this so that if object is present somewhere else (e.g. under subnet tree) it won't be displayed in the root. But in cases when user does not has access to any container/subnet containing a node, but has access rights to the node itself, it would be display in the the root.</p>
<p dir="auto">Currently you can have "Unbound stuff" container somewhere with this auto-bind script, it will pick objects that are not present in any other containers:</p>
<p dir="auto">for(p : $object.parents) {<br />
  println(classof(p));<br />
  if ((classof(p) == "Container") and <a href="http://p.id" rel="nofollow ugc">p.id</a> != $<a href="http://container.id" rel="nofollow ugc">container.id</a>) return false;<br />
}<br />
return true;</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.netxms.org/post/33437</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.netxms.org/post/33437</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Filipp Sudanov]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 09:10:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>