<![CDATA[Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded]]>Hello.

We are planing to provide binary packages for NetXMS, but we need to decide, which OS / Distribution should go first.

Note: most likely that there will be no binary package for Gentoo - only .ebuild, since Gentoo is user-build and completely unpredictable in sense of libraries and their versions.

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/topic/889/binary-packages-which-distribution-is-most-demandedRSS for NodeFri, 13 Nov 2026 11:05:34 GMTWed, 24 Mar 2010 20:42:47 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded on Mon, 12 May 2014 15:25:36 GMT]]>Hi,

There is a port for 1.2.13 in preparation.
Check http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/188406

I have used it.
I have had to delete "NO_PACKAGE=    yes" line from the Makefile in order to build and install.
It build and install ok, the server is stable.

I have problem with the agent (1.2.13). For different parameters the agent return INTERNAL_ERROR.
An agent log (debug level 9) look like this:

[11-May-2014 11:51:52.658] [DEBUG] [session:0] Received message CMD_GET_PARAMETER
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.659] [DEBUG] [session:0] Requesting parameter "Net.Interface.BytesIn(1)"
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.659] [DEBUG] [session:0] GetParameterValue(): result is 500 (INTERNAL_ERROR)
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.659] [DEBUG] [session:0] Sending message CMD_REQUEST_COMPLETED (size 32)
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.661] [DEBUG] [session:0] Message dump:
  ** 004100000000005800002E8000000001
  ** 00000055010000000000003600530079
  ** 007300740065006D002E004D0065006D
  ** 006F00720079002E0050006800790073
  ** 006900630061006C002E005500730065
  ** 0064000000650072
  ** code=0x0041 (CMD_GET_PARAMETER) flags=0x0000 id=11904 size=88 numFields=1
  ** [    85] STRING "System.Memory.Physical.Used"

[11-May-2014 11:51:52.661] [DEBUG] [session:0] Received message CMD_GET_PARAMETER
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.661] [DEBUG] [session:0] Requesting parameter "System.Memory.Physical.Used"
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.662] [DEBUG] [session:0] GetParameterValue(): result is 0 (SUCCESS)
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.662] [DEBUG] [session:0] Sending message CMD_REQUEST_COMPLETED (size 64)
[11-May-2014 11:51:52.663] [DEBUG] [session:0] Message dump:
  ** 004100000000004800002E8100000001
  ** 00000055010000000000002600530079
  ** 007300740065006D002E004300500055
  ** 002E004C006F00610064004100760067
  ** 0035320033003900
  ** code=0x0041 (CMD_GET_PARAMETER) flags=0x0000 id=11905 size=72 numFields=1

Maybe somebody have a suggestion.

Thanks,
V.V.

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/13881https://forum.netxms.org/post/13881Mon, 12 May 2014 15:25:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded on Wed, 09 Apr 2014 14:04:42 GMT]]>I'll see what I can do. I already have a setup with MySQL so I can start with that.

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/13513https://forum.netxms.org/post/13513Wed, 09 Apr 2014 14:04:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded on Wed, 09 Apr 2014 06:17:27 GMT]]>Even upgrading port to latest release will be great. If test system is a problem, I can provide you access to test virtual machines with FreeBSD. Please contact me directly if you are interested.

Best regards,
Victor

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/13479https://forum.netxms.org/post/13479Wed, 09 Apr 2014 06:17:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded on Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:07:36 GMT]]>@tvadakin said in Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded:

I second the FreeBSD port!  ;D

I can make the port for MySQL but I'm not going to test all the other database options.. It's my only machine and I want to keep it clean. Can't promise that I can keep it up2date either..
I'm out of a job now so I have time, but I hope that won't be for long..

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/13465https://forum.netxms.org/post/13465Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:07:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded on Fri, 04 Apr 2014 02:46:46 GMT]]>I second the FreeBSD port!  ;D

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/13440https://forum.netxms.org/post/13440Fri, 04 Apr 2014 02:46:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded on Tue, 04 Mar 2014 23:04:31 GMT]]>Don't bother with a FreeBSD package.. create a port, not a package.
There is one but it's version 1.0.13

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/13071https://forum.netxms.org/post/13071Tue, 04 Mar 2014 23:04:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded on Sat, 04 Jan 2014 21:35:17 GMT]]>we use OpenSUSE 13.1 because of the new Hyper-V Gen2 Support

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/12385https://forum.netxms.org/post/12385Sat, 04 Jan 2014 21:35:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded on Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:40:55 GMT]]>Personally i use centos x64 so i would like to have rpm built for  both x86 and x64 for centos.

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/11711https://forum.netxms.org/post/11711Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:40:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded on Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:24:21 GMT]]>+1 for a Debian repo

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/11661https://forum.netxms.org/post/11661Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:24:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded on Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:01:43 GMT]]>Hi!

Yes, x64 Debian packages will be released soon.

Best regards,
Victor

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/5299https://forum.netxms.org/post/5299Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:01:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded on Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:37:10 GMT]]>Hi,

Are there any plans to release .deb-packages for x64 for Debian/Ubuntu?

Thanks.

]]>https://forum.netxms.org/post/5296https://forum.netxms.org/post/5296Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:37:10 GMT