That's what we have done but it's tedious and having a proper installer is superior in every way.

Yes, sounds reasonable. I've registered it in bug tracker: https://track.radensolutions.com/issue/NX-1887 Best regards, Victor

Likewise if there was a way to enable the responsible users to be listed on the overview as well that would be cool.  One less trip to the node properties.

Есть старый feature request на эту тему: https://track.radensolutions.com/issue/NX-470. По идее добавить несложно, можно будет сделать в 3.4 или 3.5.

Would be nice to be able to edit multiple objects in gui.  I know this can be done via scripting but it would be so nice to be able to multi select multiple nodes right click and change any of those attributes such as polling, map appearance, proxy .. etc    Or be able to add nodes to a container and make global changes to each node in the container.  Thanks for an awesome product.

IPv6 is supported by all components for many years already. Best regards, Victor

Hello, For certain cases it would be very useful it we could specify as a DCI parameter source IP address for the Service Monitoring connections ServiceCheck.* Our use case is we are monitoring 2 different paths to the same destination, where you select the path based on the source IP you are using to connect. thanks in advance!

Hello, links for world map are considered for some time already, but it is not high priority feature. Layers also could be possible to implement. You could register feature request in our tracker with more detailed description how layers can be configured and displayed. Best regards, Victor

It will be grate if we can also bind Network Map and dashboard in containers.. it will save us a lot of time and confusion Thanks Alessandro

Hello Would it be possible to increase node name lenght? Currently its limited to 63. For example 100 would be good. Egert

Hi, I think that we should have TR-069 support. I have registered it as feature request: https://track.radensolutions.com/issue/NX-1777. I'll try to experiment with it as time permits. Best regards, Victor

Thank you, Victor! It is great!

NetXMS should display Node Name and Interface Alias in this case. It's hard when i add more physical link to link aggregation. [image: linkmap.JPG]

@millenium7 said in Network Configuration Management: Unimus is a lot cheaper if you only need to automate a handful of devices, but Solarwinds gets much cheaper as you get beyond about 250-500. I can see you've added more functionality since we were looking at Unimus but its still crazy expensive over time. Unimus pricing at this time is $4,500/year for 1000 devices. We got a Solarwinds NCM1000 licence for something like $8000 (I don't remember exactly) but its a once off lifetime licence, we have the software forever. We lose software support after it expires (which were very helpful but we don't need it now) or we can renew it at a drastically reduced price (far less than unimus pricing for a year) Solarwinds NCM licenses differ in pricing by region, but for US/EMEA regions, the NCM DL1000 license is $12.000. This is with 1 year maintenance only. After that, renewing the DL1000 license when out-of-maintenance is $8.000 yearly. (you may have different pricing in other regions, or if you already have other Solarwinds products) You can easily verify Solarwinds NCM pricing by Googling "Solarwinds NCM DL1000 price". Unimus is MUCH cheaper at $4.500 yearly at the 1.000 device tier. The CHEAPEST Solarwinds NCM (DL50) license, is $2.900. Unimus for 50 devices is $225 yearly. In ALL cases (including Unlimited licensing), Unimus is cheaper than Solarwinds. And while technically you can run Solarwinds without support, personally I don't think running unsupported and unpatched versions of software that is supposed to be your main configuration management over your network is a good idea. Unimus is based on a SaaS model, so you ALWAYS have support when you need it, and you are always running the latest and supported version of software. This is because telling the customer "you need to pay $8.000 to receive support" when you run upon a bug after the 1st year is really scummy (assuming the 1.000 device tier again). Unimus is also constantly adding features, with over 6 new releases each year for the last 3 years. Not to mention Unimus will just work ootb with all 140+ supported vendors, including Config Push - no need to disable prompt matching, or fiddle with it in any way. There is also direct NetXMS support through NMS Sync, and the device support list is more extensive than Solarwinds.

Hi Victor, is there any update for this feature ? greetings @victor said in Projector communication and management protocol PJlink: Hi, it could be added in then future. Sounds interesting, it's just a matter of time required to implement and available resources. I'll add it to feature requests in our tracker. And of course if there will be somebody willing to sponsor development of such add-on we can do it upon request. Best regards, Victor

Sorry, my bad. I forgot "make" part after "./configure" and before "make install"

Очень не хватает кнопки, для того чтобы создавать новый SNMP trap, или новый event через копирование существующего. Чтобы не надо было каждый раз заполнять всё с нуля, создавая несколько похожих записей.

I made a thread about this a while ago but can't find it My understanding was NetXMS builds L2 topology maps by looking at MAC addresses on a port, but it has a restriction that the port must only contain 1 MAC address. This means its impossible to build a L2 topology map if there are wireless links because at minimum there will be 3 (other device/switch, AP and SM radios) The vast majority of our network is wireless hence L2 topology has been useless to me. But i'd like the ability to use it and create from a seed router in our network and see the links that connect to all other directly connected switches/radios coming off it And i'd also like to use a separate instance of NetXMS to map out unknown networks that contain wireless links between buildings etc I have no idea how hardcoded the current implementation is. But it would be nice if we could override this behavior in server configuration, or on a map-by-map basis so any additional MAC addresses on a port are shown. Or if node for that MAC is not known just add all extra ones as a ? symbol I.e SwitchA   | ? (MAC of AP AND SM)   | SwitchB   /        Node1  Node2 That is much more useful than using SwitchA as seed and nothing at all shows up. And SwitchB only shows Node1/Node2

В 3.0 у events добавлены теги, по ним можно фильтровать список events.

Hello Would it be possible to add possibility of adding lines / links between nodes? For example show connections between wireless acces points ? Egert