Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Announcements
  3. NetXMS 3.0 released

NetXMS 3.0 released

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Announcements
35 Posts 15 Posters 102.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V
    V
    Victor Kirhenshtein
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @tomaskir said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

    @victor said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

    That's complicated issue. Current implementation is a bit messy with $n variables after matching. Consider the following code:

    v = "error 43";
    if (v ~= "(error|warning) ([0-9]+)")
    	println("Step 1: $1=".$1." $2=".$2);
    if (v ~= "(error .*|info ([0-9]+))")
    	println("Step 2: $1=".$1." $2=".$2);
    

    In NetXMS 2.2 $2 will be equal "43" on step 2, which is kind of misleading. It was because implementation in 2.2 silently skipping unmatched capture groups. Implementation in 3.0 resets all unused $n variables, which has side effect of clearing $1 if there were no capture groups at all. Looks like it was bad decision to use same names for capture groups and script arguments.

    I want to gradually clean up inconsistencies in NXSL, and that could lead to break up of some things. I think that for now I can introduce server configuration variable (off by default) that will prevent resetting of unused capture group variables. Also I will introduce separated naming for script arguments and capture groups so scripts could be migrated over time to non-overlapping variable naming. Also for transformation scripts I think it is worth passing raw value not only as first argument to the script but also as global variable, like $rawValue.

    Best regards,
    Victor

    The problem here is that there are likely thousands of scripts all around the Forums, Wiki and the internet that this change breaks.
    Every single one would have to be updated - which is unrealistic.
    For new users who find some regex-based scripts on the internet, they will not work, and they don't know why.

    Existing implementations (scripts) will start working differently upon upgrade, without any knowledge of the system operators
    This will be VERY difficult to track down, as this will not produce script errors, rather things will just work differently.
    This means there can be a threshold script which will "pretend" to still work, but in reality will not work.
    It puts burden on system operators to review every script they have upon upgrade to check if it still works properly

    What I personally would propose:
    There are far less scripts using regex capture groups than just regex.
    So if a change is needed, only regex capture group should be changed, without affecting regex operations without capture groups (as is the case now).

    What about capturing regex returning arrays with captures?

    matchArrray = "test" ~= "t(e)(s)t";
    
    println(matchArrray [0] . matchArrray [1]);
    for (match : matchArrray) {
      print(match);
    }
    

    This would clean up the reuse of $1, $2, etc. without breaking ALL regex handling.
    The change would only affect a smaller part of community, so less impact.

    I've changed regexp expressions to return array with capture groups instead of boolean value. It still sets $n variables for compatibility but does not erase unused variables (so if there is no capture groups in regexp $1 will be left intact). As a side effect it is now possible do directly access capture group from regexp. For example the following code

    text = "error 43";
    errorCode = (text ~= "error ([0-9]+)")[1];
    println(errorCode);
    

    will print 43.

    Best regards,
    Victor

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V
      V
      vir_db
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      @vir_db said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

      Hi Alex,
      do you mean this git? https://github.com/netxms/grafana

      seems last commit was in june:

      Link Preview Image
      Commits · netxms/grafana

      Grafana integration module for NetXMS. Contribute to netxms/grafana development by creating an account on GitHub.

      favicon

      GitHub (github.com)

      I reported an issue on GitHub https://github.com/netxms/grafana/issues/3

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B
        B
        brettmilfos
        wrote on last edited by
        #22

        @victor said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

        @brettmilfos said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

        Just upgraded and have found an issue with SMS.

        It created the migrated notification channel but did not work.

        I tried to create a new notification channel, but there is nothing to select in the Driver name drop down.

        Thanks, Brett.

        How did you install server? On what platform?

        Best regards,
        Victor

        Hi Victor,

        Updated from 2.2.17 server 2k8r2 with existing generic SMS.

        Cheers, Brett.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • V
          V
          Victor Kirhenshtein
          wrote on last edited by
          #23

          Hi,

          I've found bug in Windows installer. Try to rename directory C:\NetXMS\lib\ncd to C:\NetXMS\lib\ncdrv and restart NetXMS Core service.

          Best regards,
          Victor

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B
            B
            brettmilfos
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            @victor said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

            Hi,

            I've found bug in Windows installer. Try to rename directory C:\NetXMS\lib\ncd to C:\NetXMS\lib\ncdrv and restart NetXMS Core service.

            Best regards,
            Victor

            Hi,

            That fixed the issue of not finding the DriverName.

            Checking the logs the generic driver finds the device OK, but when I try to send a notification it says it cannot send the notification as there is no such channel name.

            Cheers, Brett.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Y
              Y
              yordi
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              Hello,

              I am using the debian repository, (http://packages.netxms.org jessie/main amd64 packages ) but it is not pickup version 3.0 .. is this not push jet ?
              or is there a other repository ?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V
                V
                Victor Kirhenshtein
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                Hi,

                there are issues with libraries needed by 3.0 in Debian Jessie and so far we have no plans to provide Debian Jessie packages for version 3.0.

                Best regards,
                Victor

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Z
                  Z
                  Tatjana Dubrovica
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  @brettmilfos said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

                  Hi,

                  That fixed the issue of not finding the DriverName.

                  Checking the logs the generic driver finds the device OK, but when I try to send a notification it says it cannot send the notification as there is no such channel name.

                  Cheers, Brett.

                  Can you please provide screenshot of Cannel configuration for GenericDriver. It is under "Configuration"->"Notification Channels"

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • V
                    V
                    vir_db
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    @alk said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

                    Plugin in grafana repo will be updated shortly.
                    In a meantime you can update it directly from git.

                    @vir_db said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

                    Thanks Viktor,

                    just another issue: seems that the upgrade brok the grafana plugin. I can get alerts, but I cannot collect any graphs (for ex. CPU Usage)

                    there are any updates about grafana plugin?
                    I saw the last commit 3 day ago, but still not working cloned in my grafana / netxms deploy

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • V
                      V
                      Victor Kirhenshtein
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      Did you clone it from our repository? Because latest version still waiting for approval to get into official Grafana plugin list.

                      Best regards,
                      Victor

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • V
                        V
                        vir_db
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        @victor said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

                        Did you clone it from our repository? Because latest version still waiting for approval to get into official Grafana plugin list.

                        Best regards,
                        Victor

                        I cloned from this git: https://github.com/netxms/grafana

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E
                          E
                          Egert143
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #31

                          May i ask what is "User agents (desktop support application)" supposed to do ? Is it somthing similar to vnc ?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T
                            T
                            Tursiops
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #32

                            From what I've seen after some basic testing, it loads a tray icon on the computer in question and allows the user to execute commands as pre-defined on the NetXMS server.
                            It's not like VNC, i.e. it's not a remote control tool.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • hayarmH
                              hayarmH
                              hayarm
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #33

                              @brettmilfos said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

                              @victor said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

                              Hi,

                              I've found bug in Windows installer. Try to rename directory C:\NetXMS\lib\ncd to C:\NetXMS\lib\ncdrv and restart NetXMS Core service.

                              Best regards,
                              Victor

                              Hi,

                              That fixed the issue of not finding the DriverName.

                              Checking the logs the generic driver finds the device OK, but when I try to send a notification it says it cannot send the notification as there is no such channel name.

                              Cheers, Brett.


                              1.png

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B
                                B
                                brettmilfos
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #34

                                @zev said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

                                @brettmilfos said in NetXMS 3.0 released:

                                Hi,

                                That fixed the issue of not finding the DriverName.

                                Checking the logs the generic driver finds the device OK, but when I try to send a notification it says it cannot send the notification as there is no such channel name.

                                Cheers, Brett.

                                Can you please provide screenshot of Cannel configuration for GenericDriver. It is under "Configuration"->"Notification Channels"

                                Hi Victor,

                                Attached is the screenshot.

                                P.S. Issue is with using Tools > Send notification

                                Thanks, Brett.


                                2019-09-23 12_55_49-Clipboard.png

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Z
                                  Z
                                  Tatjana Dubrovica
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #35

                                  Found problem. It should be only with sending notification using "Send Notification" functionality form UI.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0

                                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                  Register Login
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups