Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Feature Requests
  3. Option to change behavior of L2 topology maps

Option to change behavior of L2 topology maps

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Feature Requests
1 Posts 1 Posters 9.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M
    M
    Millenium7
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I made a thread about this a while ago but can't find it
    My understanding was NetXMS builds L2 topology maps by looking at MAC addresses on a port, but it has a restriction that the port must only contain 1 MAC address. This means its impossible to build a L2 topology map if there are wireless links because at minimum there will be 3 (other device/switch, AP and SM radios)
    The vast majority of our network is wireless hence L2 topology has been useless to me. But i'd like the ability to use it and create from a seed router in our network and see the links that connect to all other directly connected switches/radios coming off it

    And i'd also like to use a separate instance of NetXMS to map out unknown networks that contain wireless links between buildings etc

    I have no idea how hardcoded the current implementation is. But it would be nice if we could override this behavior in server configuration, or on a map-by-map basis so any additional MAC addresses on a port are shown. Or if node for that MAC is not known just add all extra ones as a ? symbol
    I.e
    SwitchA
      |
    ? (MAC of AP AND SM)
      |
    SwitchB
      /       
    Node1  Node2

    That is much more useful than using SwitchA as seed and nothing at all shows up. And SwitchB only shows Node1/Node2

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

    Register Login
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups