Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. wrong cpu utilization

wrong cpu utilization

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
4 Posts 2 Posters 14.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N
    N
    no-smoke
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello,
    i installed the netxms agent on two linux servers (Ubuntu Server 12.04 LTS) and on both servers the netxms agent gives a wrong number of cpu in the system an a wrong cpu utilization. Everytime there is one missing cpu and the cpu utilization is too high. When the server shell with the command top says there is cpu utilization of 10% netxms still says 51%. During hours the utilization changes a bit, but everytime arround 50% and wrong.

    How can I resolve the problem.
    The load is of the cpu is correct.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V
      V
      Victor Kirhenshtein
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hi!

      Please post content of /proc/stat from problematic node.

      Best regards,
      Victor

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N
        N
        no-smoke
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        first server:

        cpu  1026606 8 198230 441807130 70584096 64 14060 308720 0 0
        cpu0 495213 8 134691 18669413 65977064 64 12964 287045 0 0
        cpu1 128898 0 17362 83457101 1923509 0 419 8101 0 0
        cpu2 136748 0 15727 84885789 662664 0 239 3993 0 0
        cpu3 102590 0 10198 85116582 503543 0 140 2765 0 0
        cpu4 70700 0 8183 85192788 448281 0 142 2514 0 0
        cpu5 92455 0 12067 84485453 1069034 0 154 4300 0 0

        second server: 

        cpu  42257555 35389 10786380 1312876350 84493531 3376 631887 4912089 0 0
        cpu0 31891962 13559 7707064 605618692 77825343 3366 610288 3974912 0 0
        cpu1 10365593 21829 3079315 707257657 6668187 10 21599 937177 0 0
        intr 1508588085 83 9 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3645170 32 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 278184297 0 3784 0 631303286 4612 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
        ctxt 4828239194
        btime 1372329089
        processes 4256224
        procs_running 1
        procs_blocked 2
        softirq 1356631060 0 262718774 1937 697845356 0 0 3 91990467 567851 303506672

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • V
          V
          Victor Kirhenshtein
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Hi!

          I've found a bug in CPU usage calculation code. Fix will be included in 1.2.9 release.

          Best regards,
          Victor

          1 Reply Last reply
          0

          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

          Register Login
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups