Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Feature Requests
  3. Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded

Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Feature Requests
12 Posts 9 Posters 253.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V
    V
    Victor Kirhenshtein
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Hi!

    Yes, x64 Debian packages will be released soon.

    Best regards,
    Victor

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • AnRkeyA
      AnRkeyA
      AnRkey
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      +1 for a Debian repo

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L
        L
        lindeamon
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Personally i use centos x64 so i would like to have rpm built for  both x86 and x64 for centos.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Dani@M3TU
          Dani@M3TU
          Dani@M3T
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          we use OpenSUSE 13.1 because of the new Hyper-V Gen2 Support

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ?
            ?
            possamai
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Don't bother with a FreeBSD package.. create a port, not a package.
            There is one but it's version 1.0.13

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T
              T
              tvadakin
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              I second the FreeBSD port!  ;D

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ?
                ?
                possamai
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @tvadakin said in Binary packages: which distribution is most demanded:

                I second the FreeBSD port!  ;D

                I can make the port for MySQL but I'm not going to test all the other database options.. It's my only machine and I want to keep it clean. Can't promise that I can keep it up2date either..
                I'm out of a job now so I have time, but I hope that won't be for long..

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • V
                  V
                  Victor Kirhenshtein
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Even upgrading port to latest release will be great. If test system is a problem, I can provide you access to test virtual machines with FreeBSD. Please contact me directly if you are interested.

                  Best regards,
                  Victor

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ?
                    ?
                    possamai
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    I'll see what I can do. I already have a setup with MySQL so I can start with that.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Z
                      Z
                      zillo
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Hi,

                      There is a port for 1.2.13 in preparation.
                      Check http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/188406

                      I have used it.
                      I have had to delete "NO_PACKAGE=    yes" line from the Makefile in order to build and install.
                      It build and install ok, the server is stable.

                      I have problem with the agent (1.2.13). For different parameters the agent return INTERNAL_ERROR.
                      An agent log (debug level 9) look like this:

                      [11-May-2014 11:51:52.658] [DEBUG] [session:0] Received message CMD_GET_PARAMETER
                      [11-May-2014 11:51:52.659] [DEBUG] [session:0] Requesting parameter "Net.Interface.BytesIn(1)"
                      [11-May-2014 11:51:52.659] [DEBUG] [session:0] GetParameterValue(): result is 500 (INTERNAL_ERROR)
                      [11-May-2014 11:51:52.659] [DEBUG] [session:0] Sending message CMD_REQUEST_COMPLETED (size 32)
                      [11-May-2014 11:51:52.661] [DEBUG] [session:0] Message dump:
                        ** 004100000000005800002E8000000001
                        ** 00000055010000000000003600530079
                        ** 007300740065006D002E004D0065006D
                        ** 006F00720079002E0050006800790073
                        ** 006900630061006C002E005500730065
                        ** 0064000000650072
                        ** code=0x0041 (CMD_GET_PARAMETER) flags=0x0000 id=11904 size=88 numFields=1
                        ** [    85] STRING "System.Memory.Physical.Used"

                      [11-May-2014 11:51:52.661] [DEBUG] [session:0] Received message CMD_GET_PARAMETER
                      [11-May-2014 11:51:52.661] [DEBUG] [session:0] Requesting parameter "System.Memory.Physical.Used"
                      [11-May-2014 11:51:52.662] [DEBUG] [session:0] GetParameterValue(): result is 0 (SUCCESS)
                      [11-May-2014 11:51:52.662] [DEBUG] [session:0] Sending message CMD_REQUEST_COMPLETED (size 64)
                      [11-May-2014 11:51:52.663] [DEBUG] [session:0] Message dump:
                        ** 004100000000004800002E8100000001
                        ** 00000055010000000000002600530079
                        ** 007300740065006D002E004300500055
                        ** 002E004C006F00610064004100760067
                        ** 0035320033003900
                        ** code=0x0041 (CMD_GET_PARAMETER) flags=0x0000 id=11905 size=72 numFields=1

                      Maybe somebody have a suggestion.

                      Thanks,
                      V.V.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups