Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Feature Requests
  3. SNMP pool of multiple devices under same IP but with different SNMP port

SNMP pool of multiple devices under same IP but with different SNMP port

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Feature Requests
7 Posts 4 Posters 37.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H
    H
    hkusulja
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Ability to have multiple nodes with same public IP, but pooling using different ports (SNMP...).
    Currently this causes node save IP conflict error.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N
      N
      nuspedmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I have the same issue. I have many devices behind NAT firewall and security rules does not allow or is technically impossible to make persistent VPN connections to all clients and all networks all the time. Also some IP networks or device IP can be the same in a different monitoring systems.

      I like the option to use custom SNMP port, but just like CactiEz I need to just add many nodes with the same IP addresses and networks, separate them in isolated regions and monitor them. In the current implementation I can use this great system only to monitor one site and this is just not enough.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T
        T
        tomaskir
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        You have 2 opions:

        1. if this is multiple customers/sites separate them into zones.
          You can research how zones work and what they are used for in the documentation.

        2. If you dont want to use Zoning, simply place a proxy in the network, and proxy SNMP over that proxy to all local devices.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H
          H
          hkusulja
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I currently use zoning and it works, which I am trying to avoid.
          I do not have devices where I can install NetXMS agent so I can't use proxy.

          Enabling simple that IP address must not be unique would resolve the issue.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T
            T
            tomaskir
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            IP address uniqueness is one of the basic concepts in NetXMS... I am pretty sure internally the code also relies on single IP = single device a lot.
            Victor will however have to comment more on this.

            Simply put a Raspberry Pi, or similar $30 Linux machine into the network, and use it as a proxy.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H
              H
              hkusulja
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @tomaskir said in SNMP pool of multiple devices under same IP but with different SNMP port:

              IP address uniqueness is one of the basic concepts in NetXMS... I am pretty sure internally the code also relies on single IP = single device a lot.
              Victor will however have to comment more on this.

              Simply put a Raspberry Pi, or similar $30 Linux machine into the network, and use it as a proxy.

              I believe so and I agree with you.
              But since it is a small network with one router and one local switch, i should not buy another device ($5 or whatever) for this simple local network and basic SNMP monitoring.
              This is simple NetXMS software limitation then, and my request/proposal is to change the behavior and single IP = single device. I also understand that this is core of the system possibly.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V
                V
                Victor Kirhenshtein
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Hi,

                I got similar requests from other users too. I'm currently considering adding "exclude from topology" option for nodes - then all topology functionality will be turned off, but node will be checked in status and conf poll using primary name and data collection will work.

                Best regards,
                Victor

                1 Reply Last reply
                0

                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                With your input, this post could be even better πŸ’—

                Register Login
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups