Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. Segfault after upgrade to 2.1-RC1

Segfault after upgrade to 2.1-RC1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
8 Posts 2 Posters 38.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T
    T
    Tursiops
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi,

    Looks like our NetXMS server decided to start segfaulting after the upgrade to 2.1-RC1.
    Reading through the dump and not being a developer, I have no idea what the underlying cause is, so here goes:

    *** Error in `netxmsd': malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted: 0x0000000035444410 ***
    ======= Backtrace: =========
    /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x777e5)[0x7f6f596457e5]
    /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x81d61)[0x7f6f5964fd61]
    /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_calloc+0xba)[0x7f6f5965221a]
    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnetxms.so.2(_ZN11NXCPMessageC1EP12NXCP_MESSAGEi+0x227)[0x7f6f599c3b47]
    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnxsrv.so.2(_ZN15AgentConnection14receiverThreadEv+0x592)[0x7f6f59c20b72]
    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnxsrv.so.2(_ZN15AgentConnection21receiverThreadStarterEPv+0x9)[0x7f6f59c21039]
    /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x76ba)[0x7f6f57a2d6ba]
    /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f6f596d482d]
    

    Anyone else seeing similar crashes? Any idea what's causing them?

    Cheers

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V
      V
      Victor Kirhenshtein
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hi,

      could you please run netxmsd under debugger and post a backtrace (https://wiki.netxms.org/wiki/Running_NetXMS_under_debugger)?

      Best regards,
      Victor

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T
        T
        Tursiops
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Hi Victor,

        after the crash, the debugger prompt did not re-appear.
        It's just stuck showing me loads of lines in the following style:

        [New Thread 0x7ffdd22b1700 (LWP 28753)]
        

        These look pretty standard during NetXMS operation and not related to the actual crash.

        The netxmsd process itself was still showing in the process list as well, but would not stop unless I sent a kill -9.
        At that point, of course, the thread in gdb terminated as well and I could not run a backtrace.

        Cheers

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T
          T
          Tursiops
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          The random segfaults continue. I can't get a backtrace using the method described in the Wiki - it never returns to gdb after crashing. Not sure if I am missing something?

          Here's another segfault output (no idea if that helps at all):

          *** Error in `netxmsd': corrupted double-linked list: 0x00007f33103c6710 ***
          ======= Backtrace: =========
          /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x777e5)[0x7f339ec357e5]
          /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x81f88)[0x7f339ec3ff88]
          /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_malloc+0x54)[0x7f339ec415d4]
          /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x2a315)[0x7f339ebe8315]
          /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x227fc)[0x7f339ebe07fc]
          /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x213a3)[0x7f339ebdf3a3]
          /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(iconv_open+0x22a)[0x7f339ebdee2a]
          /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnetxms.so.2(ucs4_to_ucs2+0x3a)[0x7f339ef9fa5a]
          /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnetxms.so.2(_ZN11NXCPMessage3setEjhPKvbm+0x548)[0x7f339efb4758]
          /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnxcore.so.2(_ZN6DCItem20fillLastValueMessageEP11NXCPMessagej+0x92)[0x7f339f4a7d52]
          /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnxcore.so.2(_ZN20DataCollectionTarget25fillMessageInternalStage2EP11NXCPMessage+0x124)[0x7f339f4b9504]
          /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnxcore.so.2(_ZN6NetObj11fillMessageEP11NXCPMessage+0x5e)[0x7f339f4e758e]
          /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnxcore.so.2(_ZN13ClientSession12updateThreadEv+0x21c)[0x7f339f524dcc]
          /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnxcore.so.2(_ZN13ClientSession19updateThreadStarterEPv+0x9)[0x7f339f525079]
          /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x76ba)[0x7f339d01d6ba]
          /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f339ecc482d]
          

          Cheers

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • V
            V
            Victor Kirhenshtein
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Hi,

            can you configure your system to generate core file after crash? I can analyze core with gdb then.

            Best regards,
            Victor

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T
              T
              Tursiops
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Hi Victor,

              I am trying that now, will let you know how it goes.

              I noticed something in the logs on the latest crash (prior to configuration change) which seemed odd:
              [ERROR] SQL query failed (Query = "SELECT idata_value,idata_timestamp FROM idata_225 WHERE item_id=1047081695 ORDER BY idata_timestamp DESC LIMIT 32767"): 42P01 ERROR:  relation "idata_225" does not exist LINE 1: SELECT idata_value,idata_timestamp FROM idata_225 WHERE item...

              I have no idea why NetXMS would try to query a table that doesn't exist for an item_id which definitely does not exist (way too high, max(item_id) in the items table is currently '668531'). This was literally the last entry in the log (I did not see anything like this in the previous crashes though).

              Cheers

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T
                T
                Tursiops
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Hi Victor,

                Had not ever had to do this before, so it was a bit of a learning experience.
                Just putting the notes down here in case it ever comes in handy for someone else (or as a reminder for myself if I need this again)

                Edited /etc/security/limits.conf and added lines to allow "core" dumps up to 10GB (soft and hard limits). The default is "0", i.e. disabled.
                Edited /etc/sysctl.conf and set the kernel.core_pattern to /var/tmp/core-%e-%t.

                Worked fine and sent links to core dumps in a private message.

                Cheers

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T
                  T
                  Tursiops
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Hi,

                  Just a FYI: The issue persisted with the release of 2.1, but has now been resolved in the latest development build.

                  A huge thank you to Victor for logging into our system, determining the underlying cause (related to Active Agent Tunnels) and fixing it.

                  Cheers

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                  Register Login
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups