Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. Radwin discovery failing

Radwin discovery failing

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
8 Posts 3 Posters 99.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J
    J
    jermudgeon
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I tried discovering some Radwin Jet devices. Subscriber units ("HSU") discovered fine using SNMPv2c.

    Base stations ("HBS"), however, didn't discover, even though discovery configuration had valid IP ranges and community strings.

    If I manually add a base station to discovery by IP, I observe that NetXMS runs through all the community strings first with v2c, and then with v1. The valid v1 string returns a response like this:

    (tcpdump)
    12:34:18.143917 IP aaaa.38220 > bbbb.161:  C="xxxx" GetRequest(58)  .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 .1.3.6.1.4.1.35160.1.1.0
    12:34:18.158012 IP bbbb.161 > aaaa.38220:  C="xxxx" GetResponse(58)  genErr@3 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0= .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0= .1.3.6.1.4.1.35160.1.1.0=

    I also note that if I use snmpget:

    [jaustin@jaustin tmp]$ snmpget -v1 -c xxxx bbbb  .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 .1.3.6.1.4.1.35160.1.1.0
    12:36:01.720684 IP aaaa.36646 > bbbb.161:  C="xxxx" GetRequest(59)  .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 .1.3.6.1.4.1.35160.1.1.0
    12:36:01.737880 IP bbbb.161 > aaaa.36646:  C="xxxx" GetResponse(59)  genErr@3 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0= .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0= .1.3.6.1.4.1.35160.1.1.0=
    Error in packet
    Reason: (genError) A general failure occured
    Failed object: iso.3.6.1.4.1.35160.1.1.0

    12:36:01.737996 IP aaaa.36646 > bbbb:160  C="xxxx" GetRequest(42)  .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0
    12:36:01.757800 IP bbbb.161 > aaaa.36646:  C="xxxx" GetResponse(66)  .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0=.1.3.6.1.4.1.4458.20.5.1.1 .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0="Wireless Link"
    iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 = OID: iso.3.6.1.4.1.4458.20.5.1.1
    iso.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 = STRING: "Wireless Link"

    -----------

    So snmpget will discard the invalid OID and try again.

    I note that 1.3.6.1.4.1.35160 is from the ping3 device driver.

    I also note that I *can* set snmp.testOID as an override on a device *that already exists*, but this does not help devices that are failing discovery.

    Any recommendations? I don't have any ping3 devices, so theoretically I could disable the driver; however, that doesn't fix the underlying logical problem.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J
      J
      jermudgeon
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I also tried manually adding nodes. Even with manual binding of SNMP string and version, discovery tries all configured SNMP community strings. This is surprising.

      Interface discovery consequently fails due to the response (ping3 driver):

      14:17:45.602526 IP aaaa.35312 > bbbb.snmp:  C="xxxx" GetRequest(59)  system.sysObjectID.0 system.sysDescr.0 E:35160.1.1.0
      14:17:45.630758 IP bbbb.snmp > aaaa.35312:  C="xxxx" GetResponse(59)  genErr@3 system.sysObjectID.0= system.sysDescr.0= E:35160.1.1.0=

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • V
        V
        Victor Kirhenshtein
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Hi,

        that's quite unusual behavior for SNMP agent to return error on whole packet due to one invalid OID, but server definitely should be modified to handle such response correctly. Is it possible to provide us remote access to one such device for debugging? If not, could you provide full packet capture (output of tcpdump -w)?

        Best regards,
        Victor

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J
          J
          jermudgeon
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I will provide a tcpdump as soon as I can. I'm running into an odd situation elsewhere and am likely going to start the db again from scratch first.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J
            J
            jermudgeon
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Here is the promised capture file. (Regular SNMP polling stripped out.) It shows the response to the discovery packet when ping3 is enabled, and the response when ping3 is disabled.


            ping3-radwin.pcapng

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • V
              V
              Victor Kirhenshtein
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Just added two new configuration options for version 3.3: driver blacklisting and switching SNMP probing into one OID per request mode. Either one should fix this issue.

              Best regards,
              Victor

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J
                J
                jermudgeon
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Saw that, Victor -- you rock! Thanks.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B
                  B
                  BobArch
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @victor said in Radwin discovery failing:

                  Just added two new configuration options for version 3.3: driver blacklisting and switching SNMP probing into one OID per request mode. Either one should fix this issue.

                  Best regards,
                  Victor

                  This configuration option for SNMP probing resolved a tough issue I had been trying to resolve for a year.  I agree with jermudgeon... you rock, Victor!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                  Register Login
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups