Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. Cisco switch doesent show all peers under interface

Cisco switch doesent show all peers under interface

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
8 Posts 2 Posters 34.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E
    E
    Egert143
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello

    What could cause this: I have Cisco C2960x-24TS-LL switch, snmp polling is enabled. But in interface tab only other Cisco switches are found (using CDP) and Mikrotik router (using LLDP). But for example servers/cameras are not discovered. Also Topology -> Switch forwarding database is empty.

    NetXMS version: 4.3.3

    .1.3.111.2.802.1.1.13.1.3.2.0 empty
    .1.3.111.2.802.1.1.13.1.4.1.1 empty
    .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1 contains info and mac addresses

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E
      E
      Egert143
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hello, is there fix in planning? Cisco switches dont show mac list and connected nodes.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • V
        V
        Victor Kirhenshtein
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Connection information for end nodes that does not support LLDP or CDP is obtained from FDB, so root cause is FDB not being retrieved from the switch.
        What driver is selected for the switch? Also, what is walk output for .1.3.6.1.2.1.17.4.3.1?

        Best regards,
        Victor

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E
          E
          Egert143
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Cisco switch: C9200L-24P-4X (17.3.4b)
          Driver: CISCO-GENERIC

          NetXMS version 4.3.5

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • V
            V
            Victor Kirhenshtein
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Sorry for delay, just get back to issues that piled up.
            Looks like switch returns FDB information, so problem is within server. Can you set debug level 6 for tag "topology.fdb", run topology poll on switch node, and show me server log?

            Best regards,
            Victor

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E
              E
              Egert143
              wrote on last edited by
              #6
              2023.06.14 08:31:02.336 *I* [logger            ] Debug level for tag "topology.fdb" set to 6
              
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.866 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-1
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-3
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-4
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-1002
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-1003
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-1004
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read port table in context vlan-1005
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.881 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): 0 entries read from dot1qTpFdbTable
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.897 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): 5 entries read from dot1dTpFdbTable
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.897 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-1
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.897 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-3
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.897 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-4
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.913 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-1002
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.913 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-1003
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.913 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-1004
              2023.06.14 08:31:14.913 *D* [topology.fdb      ] GetSwitchForwardingDatabase([Sw] SWITCH [132981]): cannot read  FDB in context vlan-1005
              2023
              2023.06.14 08:31:20.710 *I* [logger            ] Debug level for tag "topology.fdb" set to 0
              

              Log from management:

              [14.06.2023 08:31:14] **** Poll request sent to server ****
              [14.06.2023 08:31:14] Poll request accepted, waiting for outstanding polling requests to complete...
              [14.06.2023 08:31:14] Starting topology poll of node [Sw] SWITCH
              [14.06.2023 08:31:14] VLAN list successfully retrieved from node
              [14.06.2023 08:31:14] Switch forwarding database retrieved
              [14.06.2023 08:31:14] Link layer topology retrieved (7 connections found)
              [14.06.2023 08:31:15] Updating peer information on interfaces
              [14.06.2023 08:31:15]    Local interface Gi1/0/10 linked to remote interface [Sw] NAME1:Gi0/10
              [14.06.2023 08:31:15]    Local interface Gi1/0/15 linked to remote interface [Sw] NAME2:Gi0/10
              [14.06.2023 08:31:15]    Local interface Te1/1/1 linked to remote interface [Sw] NAME3:Ethernet1/1
              [14.06.2023 08:31:15]    Local interface Te1/1/2 linked to remote interface [Sw] NAME4:Ethernet1/1
              [14.06.2023 08:31:15] Link layer topology processed
              [14.06.2023 08:31:15] Finished topology poll of node [Sw] SWITCH
              [14.06.2023 08:31:15] **** Poll completed successfully ****
              

              Thats the output i got. Hope it helps.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V
                V
                Victor Kirhenshtein
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Am I understand correctly that this problem is on all Cisco switches? What SNMP version you are using? If you are using version 3, make sure that you have allowed access to vlan-* contexts. Command should be similar to this:

                snmp-server group GroupName V3 priv context vlan- match prefix
                

                Best regards,
                Victor

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E
                  E
                  Egert143
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Problem is present on all Cisco switches yes, snmp version is v3. I tested the context snmp command on one switch and now it shows other peer nodes aswell. il have to test other switches toobut i think the solution is found. Thank you for the helpfull tip! 🙂 

                  Egert

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                  Register Login
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups