Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. Help Request: Configuration and Usage of Topology Functions

Help Request: Configuration and Usage of Topology Functions

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
8 Posts 4 Posters 61.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J
    J
    justrest
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Dear Support Team,
    I’m writing to seek technical support for two issues with the network topology functions.
    When I right-click a node, select Topology maps, and choose Layer 2 topology or other topology types, the displayed topology coverage is far too large. It appears that the discovery scope is not restricted by the parameter Topology.DefaultDiscoveryRadius, which is currently set to 5.
    Regarding the Network Map feature: when using MSTP links with ISP communication devices deployed between two end nodes, the system sometimes fails to recognize the connection relationship between the two terminal nodes. We presume this issue results from improper configuration of the intermediate ISP-side devices.
    We sincerely hope you can offer relevant solutions and troubleshooting suggestions. Thank you very much for your help!
    Best regards!


    2026-05-18_09-10-21.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F
      F
      Filipp Sudanov
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Which exactly is your NetXMS version?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J
        J
        justrest
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        V6.1.2

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J
          J
          justrest
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          But this topology issue seems to persist. I’m not sure if it’s due to my wrong configuration. Could you please give me some guidance? Thanks a lot!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A
            A
            Alex Kirhenshtein
            wrote on last edited by
            #5
            1. Topology.DefaultDiscoveryRadius

            After checking the code, the ad-hoc Topology maps → Layer 2 topology action does send the "use server default" sentinel from the client, and the server is supposed to substitute Topology.DefaultDiscoveryRadius for it. However, we have found a likely bug in how that sentinel survives the trip from client to server (signed/unsigned conversion of the radius field) that can cause the server to use a huge depth instead of the configured one — which matches what you are seeing.

            We are opening an internal ticket for the developers to verify and fix. To confirm whether your installation is affected, could you share:

            • Server build number and desktop client build number (full version strings).

            • A short server log captured during one click on the menu, with these debug tags enabled:

              DebugTags = topo.*:7,poll.topology:7,topology.*:7
              

              We are interested in the nDepth= value the topology builder receives. If it is something like 4294967295 (or any value other than 5), that is the bug confirmed for your environment.

            1. MSTP links via ISP-side intermediate devices

            This part is expected behavior, not a bug. NetXMS builds L2 topology by reading FDB, LLDP, CDP and STP tables from each managed device. If the intermediate ISP devices are not managed in NetXMS, there are no neighbor records on the path between your two end nodes, so the server cannot infer the connection. The requirement that all network equipment be registered in the system is documented here: Network topology.

            Two ways forward:

            • Add the ISP intermediate devices as managed nodes (needs SNMP access from your monitoring zone). Once they participate, LLDP/CDP/STP from each side will let NetXMS stitch the path.
            • If you cannot manage them, automatic end-to-end discovery across them will not work — you can add the link manually as a connection on a Network Map.

            Useful diagnostic regardless: on each end node's Interfaces tab, the Peer Discovery Protocol column shows how (or whether) each neighbor was discovered — that confirms which protocol is or isn't reaching across the ISP segment.

            We will update this thread once the developers confirm the fix for #1.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J
              J
              justrest
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Thank you very much. The nDepth attribute was not found in the logs. Could you please help check the log files. Thanks a lot!


              netxmsd.zip

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V
                V
                Victor Kirhenshtein
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I just checked on my system, and topology map definitely takes Topology.DefaultDiscoveryRadius into consideration. Are you sure your map has more than 5 hops from seed node? It is hard to understand from screenshot, too many objects. You can try to set zoom level to 50% or 25% and then do refresh - map will be re-layout to fit screen but at new zoom level.
                You can also try to set discovery radius to lower value, like 1 or 2 to check that it is working.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J
                  J
                  justrest
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  We suspect it might be a switch configuration problem, yet it functions normally occasionally. We’ll keep an eye on it. Thanks for your help.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                  Register Login
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups