Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. Disk.Used poll on UNC-Pathes isn't working with 64bit-Agent 1.1.0

Disk.Used poll on UNC-Pathes isn't working with 64bit-Agent 1.1.0

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
8 Posts 3 Posters 25.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J
    J
    joel4321
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Good morning,

    We are monitoring several netapp's with the Disk.Used DCI on UNC Pathes, it works like a charm. On our new win 2008 64bit servers we installed the 1.1.0 agent (tried also the newest one) and created the same dci, but unfortunenately it doesn't work on our 64bit systems.

    Is this a known issue? Does anyone know how we can solve or workaround the issue?

    By the way: With the filesystem.used it neither works, it seems that UNC Pathes are not supported.

    Thank you,

    Joël

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V
      V
      Victor Kirhenshtein
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hi!

      I'll try to test this on my win2008 in a few days. Hard to tell something without tests.

      Best regards,
      Victor

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J
        J
        joel4321
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Hi Victor,

        Yeah, I agree  😉

        Thanks for your investigation on that.

        Best,

        Joël

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J
          J
          joel4321
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Have you got any news?

          We are still having this issue with agent version 1.1.5.
          Be aware that we are still using the stable server version (v.1) in combination with the 64bit-agents.

          best regards,

          Joël

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • V
            V
            Victor Kirhenshtein
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Hi!

            Sorry for late reply. I finally do some tests on Windows 2008. Currently for me it looks like security issue - for example, agent running under local system account cannot access some shares, but if I run it under domain admin account, everything works fine.  Could you please check that account you are using for running agent service has appropriate rights to the shares you are trying to check?

            Best regards,
            Victor

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L
              L
              lindeamon
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              hi victor,

              apparently the disk.used parameter did not show up when i listed the available parameters of an agent,why is that ?
              wasn't the tool "supported parameters" suppose to show me that ? if it wasn't for this post i would have never known that there are parameters that are enabled but not listed.
              this help me a lot cause instead of creating a startup script for mapping a drive and then check it now i am free to apply this check on any agent i want.

              Best Regards,
              Lindeamon

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V
                V
                Victor Kirhenshtein
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                All Disk.* names are deprecated and replaced with appropriate FileSystem.* parameters (so Disk.Used became FileSystem.Used). Agent still support old names to maintain compatibility with already configured DCIs, but did not report them as supported to encourage users to use new naming.

                Best regards,
                Victor

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L
                  L
                  lindeamon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

                  i will give this a try cause i think i have tried it before and it did not worked.

                  Best Regards,
                  Lindeamon

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0

                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                  Register Login
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups