Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. Problem with the Ethernetbox from Messpc

Problem with the Ethernetbox from Messpc

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
16 Posts 2 Posters 31.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B
    B
    Bzkvbl.liestal
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Hi,

    Thanks for the reply. We tested it with the tools, but the host doesn't answer(request timed out). However we tested it with the mibbrowser from ireasoning and with the snmptester from the Paessler AG. We got the values with both tools. We used the snmptester on the server where we installed netxms as well as on a client. We also used an other ethernetbox, but the same problem occurred. The problem occured after the update from the netxms version 1.0.7 to 1.2.7.

    Edit: We installed Netxms (V1.2.7) on an other Server but the result was the same.

    Best regards

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V
      V
      Victor Kirhenshtein
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      So, version 1.0.7 was working? That means some bug in NetXMS SNMP library. Is it possible to send me captured packets sent between NetXMS and ethernetbox? Also, is it possible that ethernetbox responds from IP address different then IP address used for request?

      Best regards,
      Victor

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B
        B
        Bzkvbl.liestal
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Hi,

        I send you the captured packets. It contains captured packets from the snmptester (first one) and from nxsnmpget (second one).

        Best regards


        captureEthernetbox.pcap

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • V
          V
          Victor Kirhenshtein
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          Hi!

          I see that snmptester uses SNMP version 1. Is it possible that device does not support SNMP version 2c? Can you try to run nxsnmpget  with -v1 option?

          Best regards,
          Victor

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B
            B
            Bzkvbl.liestal
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Hello,

            The -v1 option worked, but we selected in the node properties communication snmpv1.

            Best regards

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • V
              V
              Victor Kirhenshtein
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Can you please do configuration poll on that device from console and send me the output?

              Best regards,
              Victor

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B
                B
                Bzkvbl.liestal
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Here is the output:

                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:00] Sending poll request to server...
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:00] Poll request accepted
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:00] Starting configuration poll for node test sensorbox
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:00] Checking node's capabilities...
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:00]    Checking SNMP...
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:56] Capability check finished
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:56] Checking interface configuration...
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:56] eUnable to get interface list from node
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:56] w  Interface "unknown" is no longer exist
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:56] Interface configuration check finished
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:56] Checking node name
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:56] Node name is OK
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:56] Finished configuration poll for node test sensorbox
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:56] Node configuration was not changed after poll
                [06-Jun-2013 14:09:56] Poll completed successfully

                Best regards

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • V
                  V
                  Victor Kirhenshtein
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Another possible problem could be if device does not support standard MIBs. NetXMS server tries to retrieve OIDs .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 and .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 to check if device can respond to SNMP. If device does not support system MIB for some reason then server will not be able to detect SNMP agent on it. Can you check that device responds to these OIDs?

                  Best regards,
                  Victor

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B
                    B
                    Bzkvbl.liestal
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    The device responded to both requests however it replied with null.

                    Best regards

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • V
                      V
                      Victor Kirhenshtein
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      That's the problem, server expects correct response here. Is there any standard MIBs this device supports? Anything under .1.3.6.1.2.1.1 or .1.3.6.1.2.1.2?

                      Best regards,
                      Victor

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B
                        B
                        Bzkvbl.liestal
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                         There aren't any standard MIBs. It begins under .1.3.6.1.4.1.14848:
                        http://www.messpc.de/MIB/betternetworks_ethernetbox.mib

                        Best regards

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B
                          B
                          Bzkvbl.liestal
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Hello,

                          Is there a way to avoid this expectation of the standard MIBs?

                          Best regards

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • V
                            V
                            Victor Kirhenshtein
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Hi!

                            Not without changing the server code. I've added a feature request for 1.2.8 release: https://www.radensolutions.com/chiliproject/issues/291.

                            Best regards,
                            Victor

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B
                              B
                              Bzkvbl.liestal
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Thanks for considering our problem for the 1.2.8 release.

                              Best regards

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                              Register Login
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups