segfault netxmsd crash
-
Hi!
you mean that you've found some specific place in added code which caused this crash?
Best regards,
Victor -
Hello,
Unfortunately it crashed again. Same error
I'm running it now under valgrind, but that takes a lot of resources. I run it with default settings
Did not have a crash yet -
Here is a part from an error from Valgrind:
==6816== Thread 7: ==6816== Invalid read of size 4 ==6816== at 0x4C5CDD0: AlarmManager::watchdogThread() (alarm.cpp:1105) ==6816== by 0x4C5CF28: WatchdogThreadStarter(void*) (alarm.cpp:204) ==6816== by 0x313D407850: start_thread (in /lib64/libpthread-2.12.so) ==6816== by 0x313CCE811C: clone (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so) ==6816== Address 0x2c8c57bc is 52,620 bytes inside a block of size 243,984 free'd ==6816== at 0x4A0610F: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:525) ==6816== by 0x4C5EF8A: AlarmManager::newAlarm(char*, char*, int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int, Event*, unsigned int) (alarm.cpp:359) ==6816== by 0x4C81704: EPRule::generateAlarm(Event*) (epp.cpp:531) ==6816== by 0x4C81D4A: EPRule::processEvent(Event*) (epp.cpp:468) ==6816== by 0x4C81F4B: EventPolicy::processEvent(Event*) (epp.cpp:814) ==6816== by 0x4C862C9: EventProcessor(void*) (evproc.cpp:225) ==6816== by 0x313D407850: start_thread (in /lib64/libpthread-2.12.so) ==6816== by 0x313CCE811C: clone (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so) -
and here is another one:
==6816== Thread 66: ==6816== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==6816== at 0x4CC549E: ClientSession::onAlarmUpdate(unsigned int, NXC_ALARM*) (session.cpp:4989) ==6816== by 0x4C631ED: EnumerateClientSessions(void (*)(ClientSession*, void*), void*) (client.cpp:337) ==6816== by 0x4C5F278: AlarmManager::newAlarm(char*, char*, int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int, Event*, unsigned int) (alarm.cpp:384) ==6816== by 0x4C81704: EPRule::generateAlarm(Event*) (epp.cpp:531) ==6816== by 0x4C81D4A: EPRule::processEvent(Event*) (epp.cpp:468) ==6816== by 0x4C81F4B: EventPolicy::processEvent(Event*) (epp.cpp:814) ==6816== by 0x4C862C9: EventProcessor(void*) (evproc.cpp:225) ==6816== by 0x313D407850: start_thread (in /lib64/libpthread-2.12.so) ==6816== by 0x313CCE811C: clone (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)Hope this helps finding the crash cause.
-
Hello,
Any progress on this?
Server is still crashing several times...Would it be an option to downgrade to 1.2.14?
This was our previous version.Thanks,
Edward -
Hi!
can you please provide full valgrind log (assuming there are more records then you post already)? Those errors logged looks like consequences of some memory corruption that happened before.
Best regards,
Victor -
-
any news on this?
I'm open for any ideas to speed up the resolve of this issue.
include some more info in the code?
reinstall system? move to other OS?Thanks,
Edward -
Hello.
Could you please also provide us with disassembly of two methods: AlarmManager::watchdogThread and AlarmManager::newAlarm?
This can be done with gdb:
$ gdb /opt/netxms/bin/netxmsd (gdb) info functions AlarmManager::watchdogThread (gdb) disassemble AlarmManager::watchdogThread (gdb) disassemble AlarmManager::newAlarm -
Hi Alex,
Thanks for responding!
attached is the output for the disassemble.Maybe good to know that I found out that the crash always occur strait after a new alarm.
Not after each alarm, but after running a couple of hours (I think after a couple of new alarms)
Also it looks that it is related to a critical event. (node down or so)
I'm trying to reproduce the crash, but that is really difficult.Today we have had not many new alarms, and it is running all day now.
I expect that as soon as start some maintenance (rebooting machines etc) we will have a crash again.Hope this helps.
Regards,
Edward
-
attached is a debug log (level
where you can see a new alarm coming in.
this was a node down alarm. direct after this we got the sigsegv.
-
Hi,
it seems one of the most mysterious bugs we've ever encounter. I've done load tests with lot of alarm generation and termination, and system works as expected. Seems it is some rare combination of events and/or environment. Is it possible to get remote access to your system to debug it in place? Alternatively, can you try to get core dump after crash (most likely it will note be generated by default, you'll have to enable it with ulimit) and sent to us along with compiled binaries? If you run it as virtual machine and can provide a VM image it also could help us with debugging.
Best regards,
Victor -
Hi Victor,
Thanks for the reply!
I'm currently running it under GDB, so as soon as I have a crash I will generate a core dump.
Is that ok for you if I do it this way?Another question:
Is is possible to fake some node down events for existing nodes?
That way I can try to reproduce the crash.Regards,
Edward -
You can gdnerate events using nxevent command line tool.
Best regards,
Victor -
I have a core dump generated.
How would you like me to send/upload it?
it is compressed 9M. (only the core file)
comressed tar from the binaries is 70M.Best regards,
Edward -
You can upload it to our anonymous ftp at ftp://netxms.org/upload/. This FTP is upload-only and support encrypted TLS sessions (optional, you'll need compatible ftp client like FileZilla).
-
Thanks,
I have uploaded the following files:
core.tgz
server-binaries.tgzdo you need anything else?
regards,
Edward -
I have uploaded a new core file.
This one is generated by abrt
regards,
Edward -
Hi,
so far our analysis shows that root of the problem is that some internal data structures are not initialized properly (if you are familiar with C++ - it seems that constructor for global instance of AlarmManager class is not called), although it is not clear why this happens. I try your binaries on CentOS 6.3 (closest that I can find) and it works as expected. Is it an option to do system upgrade to latest versions of kernel and glibc and try again? If this will not help, I'll re-write alarm manager initialization and provide you with intermediate build for testing.
Best regards,
Victor -
Hi Victor,
I have upgraded my system from Oracle Linux 6.3 to 6.5
glibc unfortunately is not updated in the release.
Also netxmsd crashed after giving it a flood of alarms.So, situation is not changed so far.
Regards,
Edward
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login