Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. Invalid network mask - v 1.2.17

Invalid network mask - v 1.2.17

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
4 Posts 2 Posters 17.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M
    M
    millerpaint
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Greetings,

    We are getting many of these alerts with version 1.2.17:

    Invalid network mask 255.255.255.192 on interface "vlan1", should be 255.255.255.0

    The /26 (255.255.255.192) is in fact the correct mask for this device; this particular node is a firewall that has VLAN's configured on a trusted port.

    -Kevin C.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V
      V
      Victor Kirhenshtein
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hi,

      most likely you already have (presumably incorrect) subnet object for /24. You can check what's inside and delete subnet object (make sure that nodes inside it bound to at least one container, then they will not be deleted with the subnet), then do configuration poll on a node - it should create correct /26 subnet object.
      Also, in 2.0 we do some fixes to subnet creation and binding logic, it will help in such situations.

      Best regards,
      Victor

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M
        M
        millerpaint
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Hi Victor,

        I think you are correct, there were some /24 subnet objects.  Some of the nodes in those /24 subnets are bound to containers, and some are not.  But any node that is not bound to a container should be re-discovered if I remove the entire subnet, correct?  Assuming of course that my discovery filters are allowing those subnets to be searched.

        -Kevin C.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • V
          V
          Victor Kirhenshtein
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Yes, nodes will be rediscovered - the only problem if you have configured some data collection on them - all collected data will be lost. If this is not the case then you can just delete them with subnets.

          Best regards,
          Victor

          1 Reply Last reply
          0

          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

          Register Login
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups