Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. varbinds are displayed incorrectly

varbinds are displayed incorrectly

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
16 Posts 3 Posters 85.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L
    L
    lindeamon
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    Hi Tursiops,

    i will try to clarify. i have changed the events when i did the testings and i have posted the latest event to show the configuration in case i did something wrong.
    i have screen shoot some events that i got to show what i get when i use POS and what i get when i use OID in the varbinds.
    i have added a screenshot of the internal unmatched event to show that it displays the information correctly even though the event itself is configured the same i have configured mine.
    i have found for ex. that configuring using POS in the traps related to my ibm tape library, it worked fine

    cheers

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V
      V
      Victor Kirhenshtein
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Hi,

      what if you set positions to 2 and 3 instead of 1 and 2?

      Best regards,
      Victor

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L
        L
        lindeamon
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        Hi Victor,

        you have taught in the past that %1 is saved for the trap itself and that POS 1 is %2 and POS 2 is %3 and this what i did in the 1st place and got the wrong info as shown in the screenshots.
        i have also tried to check the "never convert to hex" and this didn't help too.

        this traps belong to fortinet core mib with snmpv2 traps if that helps.

        Best Regards,
        Lindeamon

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T
          T
          Tursiops
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          Hi,

          I've been doing some testing with an informational trap which one of our systems generates every few minutes.

          My first real excursion into SNMP traps, but I can't get the parameter to be passed using varbinds either.
          It does not matter if I use POS:1, POS:2 or POS:3 (for the first and only varbind in this trap) and "Never convert value to hex string" makes no difference.

          Setting up a mapping by object ID works perfectly fine.

          Cheers

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L
            L
            lindeamon
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            Hi Victor,

            some thing happened along the way with varbind position.
            i have upgraded one of my netxms to v2.1 and all my SNMP traps are showing incorrect data.
            information of what suppose to be in POS:1, is incorrect.
            my 1st post here talked about v2.0.8 but this system, if recall correctly, worked fine with v2.0.8
            when i look at the snmp trap log, i see the varbinds in the right order as i expected. the alarm for some reason, takes the wrong value.
            i do not wat to spend more time re-configuring all my snmp trap list

            what can i do ?

            Best Regards,
            Lindeamon

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • V
              V
              Victor Kirhenshtein
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              Hi,

              from description it seems like a bug. I'll try to reproduce it myself.

              Best regards,
              Victor

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L
                L
                lindeamon
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                thank you very much, looking forward to solve this problem...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • V
                  V
                  Victor Kirhenshtein
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  Hi,

                  just fixed this bug in development branch. Fix will be included in 2.1.1 patch release.

                  Best regards,
                  Victor

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L
                    L
                    lindeamon
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    Hi Victor,

                    as always, thank you very much for all the help and for this awesome software.

                    Best Regards,
                    Lindeamon

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L
                      L
                      lindeamon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      Hi Victor,

                      can you please tell me when is this patch due ?
                      i get a lot of snmp traps which i can't understand.

                      Best Regards,
                      Lindeamon

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • V
                        V
                        Victor Kirhenshtein
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        Hi,

                        we plan 2.1.1 release this or next week.

                        Best regards,
                        Victor

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups