Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. LLDP not discovered on NETONIX

LLDP not discovered on NETONIX

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
5 Posts 2 Posters 25.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G
    G
    gmonk63
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I have version 2.2.6 which I noticed does not properly discovery lldp on NETONIX switches.  I have looked at the release notes of the newer versions and no of these address this. Im wondering if this is a bug.  I can pull the lldp database using snmp client and see all listed neighbors but node does not show lldp enabled

    Thanks

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V
      V
      Victor Kirhenshtein
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hi,

      server checks OID .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.3.2.0 (lldpLocChassisId) as test for LLDP support on device. Did your device returns anything under .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.3 (lldpLocalSystemData)?

      Best regards,
      Victor

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G
        G
        gmonk63
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Victor,

        Sorry i completely forgot about this.  No this switch does not respond to those OID's only the remote table seems to be populated. Is it possible to do a check on the remote table for any entries and enable LLDP  based on if any neighbors are found as well.  I dont know why this switch does not respond to .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.3.2.0  or  .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.3  but Im sure there could be other off brand switches that do the same.

        Thanks,

        Gary

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • V
          V
          Victor Kirhenshtein
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Hi,

          LLDP chassis ID is important to match LLDP data from two peer switches. Can you show me remote table from one of peers of this switch?

          Best regards,
          Victor

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G
            G
            gmonk63
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.2.84659416.13.1 [INTEGER] = 13
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.2.84658408.12.2 [INTEGER] = 12
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.3.84659416.13.1 [INTEGER] = 1
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.3.84658408.12.2 [INTEGER] = 2
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.4.84659416.13.1 [INTEGER] = 4
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.4.84658408.12.2 [INTEGER] = 4
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.5.84659416.13.1 [STRING] = ec-13-b2-63-96-7c
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.5.84658408.12.2 [STRING] = 6c-3b-6b-54-b0-e2
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.6.84659416.13.1 [INTEGER] = 5
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.6.84658408.12.2 [INTEGER] = 5
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.7.84659416.13.1 [STRING] = Port 14
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.7.84658408.12.2 [STRING] = ether1
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.8.84659416.13.1 [STRING] = Port 14
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.8.84658408.12.2 [STRING] =
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.9.84659416.13.1 [STRING] = 1971_BPDO_SW
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.9.84658408.12.2 [STRING] = MTIK_UNDO_AP
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.10.84659416.13.1 [STRING] = Netonix WS-12-250-AC
            .1.0.8802.1.1.2.1.4.1.1.10.84658408.12.2 [STRING] = MikroTik RouterOS 6.42.9 (long-term) RB Groove A-52HPn r2

            The above is the lldpRemTable from a Netonix switch in the field.  We are having the same issues with our Mikrotik switches.  I understand the need for the LLDP chassis ID but it seems there are several switches that only populate remote table info  and are there any cases why the LLDP chassis ID would differ from the Bridge Base Address could you not supplement this base address assuming the checks for LLDP chassis ID fail but only if there are entries in the LLDPRemtable

            Thanks,

            Gary

            1 Reply Last reply
            0

            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

            Register Login
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Users
            • Groups