Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. Disable Discovery of Attached Prefix

Disable Discovery of Attached Prefix

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
4 Posts 3 Posters 32.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C
    C
    celerityjbd
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello. I manually added an edge router that peers into an IX and NetXMS is discovering all the devices via ICMP (and trying to poll via SNMP) all the devices which are on the same L2 as my router in the IX peering network. I recognize this is by design, but in this case, I need to exclude this subnet from being discovered in any way. Is this possible?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C
      C
      celerityjbd
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I think I may have figured it out. I had set Network Discovery to Active and Passive, but Discovery Filter was set to "No filtering". I set it to "Accept node if it's within given range" and added prefixes to the Address Filters list.
      Is this the right way to limit passive discovery?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Z
        Z
        Zebble
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        We have the same issue, but we use a lot of Zones with Proxy Nodes and a lot of overlapping subnets so using the "Accept node if it's within given range" can be cumbersome to manage.  The only way I found so far to prevent scanning in our case is to add firewall rules on the edge device that prevents connectivity and scanning to that subnet, from the proxy node.

        If there's a better way to do this, I'm all ears!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • V
          V
          Victor Kirhenshtein
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          For zoned environments probably the only way is to use filtering script that will check allowed ranges per zone. Mapping tables or custom attributes on zone objects can be used to store allowed or forbidden ranges.
          But in general I think we need per zone address range filters, probably implemented as zone object properties.

          Best regards,
          Victor

          1 Reply Last reply
          0

          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

          Register Login
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups