NetXMS Forum

IMPORTANT UPDATE:

[06-May-2015 17:33:44.897] [DEBUG] StatusPoll(10.5.1.200): starting child object poll
[06-May-2015 17:33:44.913] [DEBUG] StatusPoll(10.5.1.200): polling interface 124 [unknown]
[06-May-2015 17:33:44.913] [DEBUG] Interface::StatusPoll(124,unknown): ping via proxy [114]
[06-May-2015 17:33:44.913] [DEBUG] Interface::StatusPoll(124,unknown): proxy node found: nodebmon
[06-May-2015 17:33:44.961] [DEBUG] Interface::StatusPoll(124,unknown): proxy response: "30"
[06-May-2015 17:33:44.962] [DEBUG] Interface::StatusPoll(124,unknown): newStatus=5 oldStatus=5 pollCount=6 requiredPolls=1
[06-May-2015 17:33:44.962] [DEBUG] StatusPoll(10.5.1.200): finished child object poll
[06-May-2015 17:33:44.962] [DEBUG] StatusPoll(10.5.1.200): bAllDown=true, dynFlags=0x00000004
[06-May-2015 17:33:44.962] [DEBUG] Node::executeHookScript(10.5.1.200 [118]): hook script "Hook::StatusPoll" not found

This log is from NetXMS daemon running on -D 9 mode. It seems that there's a hook script missing.

Thanks, d-ray!

Привет! Просто нажмите правую кнопку на нужной узла и получить доступ к меню настройки сбора данных! Увидимся!

Hi gustavosm!

My team will also work with about 15k nodes and we are doing some research to find a nice tunning to our Postgre DB. When we have a nice tunning I'll be happy on share it with you!

May the force of bikeprata be with you!

That would be great, Jhuliagraziella! I support your idea and would love to see some feature like that!

May the force be with you!

Hello everyone!

I'm having trouble on using a external agent to do ICMP polling on version 2.0-M4.

I created a new zone, sellected a working agent to monitor that zone and put a working node there (node stats were UP and low latency response). After that, the node status went down and polling requests from server returns that the node is unreacheble.

This is very odd because I checked via tcpdump that the agent is receiving the polling request and is sending a ICMP packet to the node. The node is answering ok with another ICMP packet that I could see on tcpdump.

It seems that somehow the agent isn't sending the info that the node is UP back to server.

Have you experienced something like that? Is there any chance that I'm doing something wrong?

Thanks in advance for your help!

Hello everyone!

I'm creating a script to populate nodes from my network, getting them from a ".csv" file. It's working pretty fine, but I can't use the method "setIpAdress()" from NXCObjectCreationData. In the method call bellow "cd" is a NXCObjectCreationData object and "objectIp" is a string with the IP formated such as in "192.168.2.1".

cd.setIpAddress(InetAddress.getByName(objectIp))

When I execute the script I get the following error:

TypeError: setIpAddress(): 1st arg can't be coerced to org.netxms.base.InetAddressEx

I couldn't find the class org.netxms.base.InetAddressEx on the API and it's stated on the NCXObjectCreationData reference that "setIpAdress()" should receive an InetAdress instance.

Could you guys help me on this?

Thanks in advance!

Edit: I'm using the 2.0.M4 version.

Hello everyone!

I'm creating a script to populate nodes from my network, getting them from a ".csv" file. It's working pretty fine, but I can't use the method "setIpAdress()" from NXCObjectCreationData. In the method call bellow "cd" is a NXCObjectCreationData object and "objectIp" is a string with the IP formated such as in "192.168.2.1".

cd.setIpAddress(InetAddress.getByName(objectIp))

When I execute the script I get the following error:

TypeError: setIpAddress(): 1st arg can't be coerced to org.netxms.base.InetAddressEx

I couldn't find the class org.netxms.base.InetAddressEx on the API and it's stated on the NCXObjectCreationData reference that "setIpAdress()" should receive an InetAdress instance.

Could you guys help me on this?

Thanks in advance!

Edit: I'm using the 2.0.M4 version.

Hello everyone!

I'm new to Network Management and I'm entering on a project which objective is create a structure to monitor more than 10k nodes. What do you think of NetXMS as a solution to this case? Can it support it, provided that we will use a cluster of computers?

Cheers!