NetXMS Forum

Thanks for the input - I will check on it asap and feedback here.

Hi Filipp, 

the example with the brackets is here: 

Data Collection from Web Services — NetXMS Administrator Guide (7.0.0)

(www.netxms.org)

You are right, I can see the DCI as "unsupported" when I go to edit mode. 

My use case: 

I am polling the Cisco Meraki API for some license informations. For the Licensed Devices, I receive a JSON.
I want to break down the json into a DCI table and therefore I created a Table DCI 
As soon as I change the Instance discovery method to Web Service, its unsupported. (and not viewable in the view mode as I learned). In the edit mode, I can see it.

KR Georg

Update: this happens everytime I add a web service instance discovery, regardless of the request string

Hi Filipp,

It happens as soon as the agent is available again, I do not trigger a config or full config .

KR

Hi community,

first of all, proms to the developers - I am implementing NetXMS now for around a month and the last Network Management system I loved that much was CA Spectrum. Thanks for the good work!

Now, I think I discovered a bug.

I am implementing a DCI with a Web Service and I am using the example here (from the bottom):
https://www.netxms.org/documentation/adminguide/web-services-monitoring.html

I try to enumerate with the Web Service method, but as soon as I enter the WebService Request 

WebService(certs/host1):[.[].friendlyName] 

and then click apply and close, the DCI is disappeared.
It really disappears, I tried to alter the view option (disabled, ...), but it is gon
when I create another DCI, also the ID counts up

KR Georg

Hi all,

I noticed today that the CISCO-WLC driver does not recognize the modern Catalyst 9800 WLCs.
I tried setting CISCO-WLC as custom attribute "snmp.driver", but the driver used on the node stays CISCO-GENERIC, even after Polling a Full Configuration.

I assume that the driver does not recognize modern Controllers, but only the AireOS models.
Is there a chance to get the driver working with 9800s? I am aware that there have been essential changes in the way the controllers work as well as in the MIBs. If I can assist you in any way, I would love to do so.

KR Georg

Hi all,

I noticed that the expected interface state is lost when a nodes snmp agent does not respond, because the interfaces get deleted and when the agent comes back on, they are newly created.

Is there a way to change this behaviour in the config?

Thank You,
KR