NetXMS Forum

Thanks Filipp, you are of course right.  It was after a recent server restart, and after a configuration poll, it is now showing up. Cheers.

File uploads are kept under Configuration -> Scheduled tasks. In the menu (three-dot button on the toolbar) you need to enable "Show system tasks".

Hi, was hoping you could build an nxagent RPM package set for Fedora 42 on packages.netxms.org?  We're experimenting with layered netxms agent on Fedora IoT atomic and it has rolled to the 42 release. Kind regards.

@filipp-sudanov said in Option to group software inventory by package: Grouping by software package looks cumbersome - e.g. some software packages tend to have version number in the name, e.g. jdk-17... and jdk-21..., could be desirable to join them somehow... So unless it's a sponsored development we don't have resources available to go into this. But, to mention, software package information is accessible from NXSL, so it might be that for some usecases you can just script something. ah yes, I see that would complicate things a lot. fair point with NXSL. @filipp-sudanov said in Option to group software inventory by package: For expansion - I've registered a ticked to add expand/collapse buttons: https://track.radensolutions.com/issue/NX-2745 Thanks, that would basically remove the need for grouping by software (the idea was to click once to expand rather than hunting through all nodes clicking).    So if you 1) filter up the top then 2) expand all, you can then 3) quickly export without too much clicking on each node.

@filipp-sudanov said in 5.2.0 dashboard rack diagram not scaled to fit element size: Yes, racks now have scaling limit so that units don't become too small. Looks like this is not ideal for dashboard use, I've created a ticket to improve that: https://track.radensolutions.com/issue/NX-2738 OK thanks.

Awesome, thanks again!

Attached is just an idea for what could be useful to see in a final version of this tool, so that you could see the winning source for any given line of the running config. Thanks again! [image: running-config-mockup.jpg]

@victor said in new desktop client - unbound nodes in infrastructure outside the folder tree: I just updated client application so that nodes without parent objects in infrastructure tree are not shown as root level objects. This change will be part of release 5.0.3. Best regards, Victor Thanks Victor, look forward to it. @filipp-sudanov said in new desktop client - unbound nodes in infrastructure outside the folder tree: Not sure why this is happening. Can you run the script I've shared manually (via Execute Script from context menu) on a couple of nodes which we bound to that container, but should not and share the output. Hi Filip, attached is a screenshot of executing the script on a node that had an existing parent.  It always seems to return true whether on a node that has no other parent or an existing node. [image: Screenshot 2024-05-15 114007.png]

Appreciate it thanks Filipp.  Fedora IoT has been an interesting platform for some appliances we've been testing with netxms and some containerized apps.

A fixed management client has just been released.

Yup, looks like a bug, will have a look.

Try 4.0.2092 agent version.

Excellent!  I suspected that was the case as well and appreciate you confirming this.

I was worried that would be the case.  I'll look into some scripts to do this. Cheers.

Hi Victor, thanks for the info... Will test this again after next patch relase... Greetings Marco

Confirm its fixed in the latest patch. Thanks again.

Preferably you should use not $node->isPrinter or !$node->isPrinter although your form will work too, because isPrinter will contain boolean value TRUE or FALSE, and if it is false then isPrinter != TRUE will produce expected result. Best regards, Victor

Likewise if there was a way to enable the responsible users to be listed on the overview as well that would be cool.  One less trip to the node properties.

At the moment, we're doing another pass on expanding our use of NetXMS given it's new features since the last time we did so (which was a while ago). What I am interested in is sharing some of the stuff we're doing, will continue that on another thread though.

Since upgrading to 3.0 I notice that network map link bend points seem to be a bit wonky. If you insert or move a bend point the link label no longer closely follows the path of the link.  Instead it stays close to the original 'direct mode' path of the link before the bend point was inserted.  In 2.x it used to stay attached to the path. Dragging bend points or adding removing sometimes seems to snap the link itself back to being direct mode although the bend point circles will stay in place.  This then flickers back and forth sometimes. I found bend points useful to map diverse VPN paths between two locations and separate them enough to read the labels clearly. I assume its a client console issue?  Although the two screenshots show two maps generated in the java console and web console so issue is common to both. NXCM: 3.0.224 Server: 3.0.2292 Edit: created NX-1691 [image: bendpoints.PNG] [image: bendpoint2.png]