Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. NetXMS CPU Usage High

NetXMS CPU Usage High

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
34 Posts 4 Posters 290.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C
    C
    clifford
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    Hi Tatjana,

    Both Servers are Virtual with same configuration and OS (Centos 7). Please see the node stats of both Server below.

    Server with issue:

    NetXMS Server Remote Console V2.2.7 Ready
    Enter "help" for command list

    netxmsd: show stats
    Objects............ 35197
    Monitored nodes.... 1122
    Collectible DCIs... 2146
    Active alarms...... 416

    Server working fine:

    NetXMS Server Remote Console V2.2.7 Ready
    Enter "help" for command list

    netxmsd: show stats
    Objects............ 32410
    Monitored nodes.... 853
    Collectible DCIs... 288
    Active alarms...... 232

    Thanks
    Clifford

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Z
      Z
      Tatjana Dubrovica
      wrote on last edited by
      #24

      Looks like you have really a lot of object updates and server is unable to delivere all updates to the client so everything just stuck. I'll rework object update messages, but can't promise the release number where it will get in.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C
        C
        clifford
        wrote on last edited by
        #25

        Hi

        I didn't get the "server is unable to deliver all updates to the client" part, cause almost all objects are switches and routers, so all we expect from the NMS is to report when the node or link is down. so all of it is SNMP Queries to the clients to check for update status

        also it is important for me to view the link status as in my below query

        https://www.netxms.org/forum/configuration/unable-to-get-bandwidth-details-on-map/msg23166/#msg23166

        hope this gets implemented, it would be the greatest thing for me,

        My NMS would be super complete 🙂

        Regards
        Clifford

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T
          T
          Tursiops
          wrote on last edited by
          #26

          I believe Tatjana means updates to be sent from the server to the Management Console (client), i.e. either the server can't send new information to the client fast enough or the client can't accept it fast enough, thus throttling the server. Once that happens, the queue of updates to send just keeps increasing as it cannot catch up. It'll probably do that until the server runs out of resources and trips over - or until the console is closed. The latter explains why your server performance came good whenever you closed the console.

          Have you considered using the Web Console for testing (sry, we're using Ubuntu, so can't give any guidance on the CentOS process)?
          As that can be installed on the server itself, it would effectively remove the network from the server to console communication.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C
            C
            clifford
            wrote on last edited by
            #27

            Hi

            Cool! i'll try the web console

            was wondering will shifting to ubuntu help?

            Regards

            Clifford Dsouza

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T
              T
              Tursiops
              wrote on last edited by
              #28

              I haven't run a NetXMS server on anything other than Ubuntu, so I really can't tell if this is any better/worse than the other options out there.
              One of our reasons for using Ubuntu (other than personal preference) was the availability of NetXMS packages directly from the developers.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C
                C
                clifford
                wrote on last edited by
                #29

                Hi,

                We have just upgraded Netxms  Server to 2.2.8, now the response seems normal from Management console however CPU utilization is showing 300% and above, below are the stats after the upgrade. Just wanted to know if it is normal.

                NetXMS Server Remote Console V2.2.8 Ready
                Enter "help" for command list

                netxmsd: show threads
                MAIN
                  Threads.............. 256 (8/256)
                  Load average......... 7838118.55 7292039.09 5187107.27
                  Current load......... 3084405%
                  Usage................ 100%
                  Active requests...... 7896078
                  Scheduled requests... 0
                  Total requests....... 12741590
                  Thread starts........ 248
                  Thread stops......... 0
                  Average wait time.... 1641274 ms

                POLLERS
                  Threads.............. 250 (10/250)
                  Load average......... 103.76 109.10 117.88
                  Current load......... 83%
                  Usage................ 100%
                  Active requests...... 208
                  Scheduled requests... 0
                  Total requests....... 30786539
                  Thread starts........ 240
                  Thread stops......... 0
                  Average wait time.... 221 ms

                DATACOLL
                  Threads.............. 96 (10/250)
                  Load average......... 4.58 5.48 5.53
                  Current load......... 1%
                  Usage................ 38%
                  Active requests...... 1
                  Scheduled requests... 0
                  Total requests....... 17575738
                  Thread starts........ 382
                  Thread stops......... 296
                  Average wait time.... 0 ms

                SCHEDULER
                  Threads.............. 1 (1/64)
                  Load average......... 0.00 0.00 0.00
                  Current load......... 0%
                  Usage................ 1%
                  Active requests...... 0
                  Scheduled requests... 0
                  Total requests....... 1750
                  Thread starts........ 0
                  Thread stops......... 0
                  Average wait time.... 0 ms

                AGENT
                  Threads.............. 4 (4/256)
                  Load average......... 0.00 0.00 0.00
                  Current load......... 0%
                  Usage................ 1%
                  Active requests...... 0
                  Scheduled requests... 0
                  Total requests....... 0
                  Thread starts........ 0
                  Thread stops......... 0
                  Average wait time.... 0 ms

                CLIENT
                  Threads.............. 16 (16/512)
                  Load average......... 0.00 0.00 0.00
                  Current load......... 0%
                  Usage................ 3%
                  Active requests...... 0
                  Scheduled requests... 0
                  Total requests....... 4586
                  Thread starts........ 0
                  Thread stops......... 0
                  Average wait time.... 0 ms

                Thank you
                Clifford.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • V
                  V
                  Victor Kirhenshtein
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #30

                  Hi,

                  load on thread pool MAIN is definitely not normal. Could you please capture thread stack traces using attached script (you will need gdb installed)?

                  Best regards,
                  Victor


                  capture_netxmsd_threads.sh

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C
                    C
                    clifford
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #31

                    Hi,

                    Please find the output of script attached for your reference.

                    Thanks
                    Clifford


                    netxmsd-threads.13495.20180910-141612

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • V
                      V
                      Victor Kirhenshtein
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #32

                      Hi,

                      looks like server is locked on sending object updates to one of user sessions. We encounter same issue in another installation recently and already changed object update notification mechanism in current development branch, so there are good chance that upgrade to 2.2.9 will fix your issue.

                      Best regards,
                      Victor

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C
                        C
                        clifford
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #33

                        Hi Victor

                        Great!!!, Eagerly waiting for v2.2.9

                        Thanks and Regards

                        Clifford

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C
                          C
                          clifford
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #34

                          Hi Victor,

                          The 2.2.9 Upgrade solved all issues

                          everything works just great!!

                          Regards

                          Clifford Dsouza

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups