Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. NetXMS CPU Usage High

NetXMS CPU Usage High

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
34 Posts 4 Posters 290.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C
    C
    clifford
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @clifford said in NetXMS CPU Usage High:

    @clifford said in NetXMS CPU Usage High:

    @clifford said in NetXMS CPU Usage High:

    @clifford said in NetXMS CPU Usage High:

    Thanks,

    i changed the values to 512, hope this helps..
    however i could not find the ThreadPool.Syncer.MaxSize parameter in the server configuration., so i manually created one, when you say it should be greater than 1, what could be the recommended value based on the stats i posted.

    netxmsd: show threads
    MAIN
      Threads:            8 (8/512)
      Load average:      0.00 0.00 0.00
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              1%
      Active requests:    0
      Scheduled requests: 0

    POLLERS
      Threads:            509 (10/512)
      Load average:      51.59 54.84 62.20
      Current load:      8%
      Usage:              99%
      Active requests:    44
      Scheduled requests: 0

    DATACOLL
      Threads:            250 (10/250)
      Load average:      4.68 4.33 2.69
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              100%
      Active requests:    0
      Scheduled requests: 0

    SCHEDULER
      Threads:            1 (1/64)
      Load average:      0.00 0.00 0.00
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              1%
      Active requests:    0
      Scheduled requests: 0

    AGENT
      Threads:            4 (4/256)
      Load average:      0.00 0.00 0.00
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              1%
      Active requests:    0
      Scheduled requests: 0

    Thanks

    Clifford

    When everything is fine and the CPU is at 3% to 25 % Usage

    netxmsd:  show threads
    MAIN
      Threads:            36 (8/512)
      Load average:      0.00 0.00 0.00
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              7%
      Active requests:    0
      Scheduled requests: 0

    POLLERS
      Threads:            510 (10/512)
      Load average:      41.75 112.32 76.88
      Current load:      44%
      Usage:              99%
      Active requests:    226
      Scheduled requests: 0

    DATACOLL
      Threads:            249 (10/250)
      Load average:      0.72 6.04 4.81
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              99%
      Active requests:    2
      Scheduled requests: 0

    SCHEDULER
      Threads:            1 (1/64)
      Load average:      0.00 0.00 0.00
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              1%
      Active requests:    0
      Scheduled requests: 0

    AGENT
      Threads:            4 (4/256)
      Load average:      0.00 0.00 0.00
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              1%
      Active requests:    0
      Scheduled requests: 0

    SYNCER
      Threads:            10 (1/10)
      Load average:      17.84 29.54 14.71
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              100%
      Active requests:    0
      Scheduled requests: 0

    When things are bad 😮

    netxmsd: show threads
    MAIN
      Threads:            2048 (8/2048)
      Load average:      2996493.60 2968151.86 2119779.01
      Current load:      145523%
      Usage:              100%
      Active requests:    2980327
      Scheduled requests: 0

    POLLERS
      Threads:            1003 (10/1024)
      Load average:      51.45 48.24 45.01
      Current load:      5%
      Usage:              97%
      Active requests:    51
      Scheduled requests: 0

    DATACOLL
      Threads:            512 (10/512)
      Load average:      5.44 2.90 1.57
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              100%
      Active requests:    0
      Scheduled requests: 0

    SCHEDULER
      Threads:            1 (1/64)
      Load average:      0.00 0.00 0.00
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              1%
      Active requests:    0
      Scheduled requests: 0

    AGENT
      Threads:            4 (4/256)
      Load average:      0.00 0.00 0.00
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              1%
      Active requests:    0
      Scheduled requests: 0

    SYNCER
      Threads:            7 (1/10)
      Load average:      0.00 1.44 5.04
      Current load:      0%
      Usage:              70%
      Active requests:    0
      Scheduled requests: 0

    System stats

    all this is just snmp traffic

    things got normal when i quit the console and all is well since reconnecting the console again

    Regards
    Clifford

     😢
    Sadly had to quite the management console again, tried with the 32 bit console also, after few minutes the system goes for a toss again

    Regards
    Clifford

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V
      V
      Victor Kirhenshtein
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      Hi,

      please do the following:

      1. Enter

      debug client.* 6

      in server console. This will turn on debug of incoming client requests.

      1. Connect with console and wait for CPU to go up.

      2. Capture threads using attached script (you should have gdb and all relevant netxms-*-dbg packages installed).

      Send me thread dump (will be in /tmp) and server log file (part for the duration of client session).

      Best regards,
      Victor

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C
        C
        clifford
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Hi Victor

        thanks for ur reply, i need clarity on the 3rd point

        1. Capture threads using attached script (you should have gdb and all relevant netxms-*-dbg packages installed
          how do i verify i have gdb and dbg packages installed , i did the standard netxms install on centos 7.

        beside that i dont see any attached scripts, and an example how to capture the threads

        Regards

        Clifford

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • V
          V
          Victor Kirhenshtein
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Hi,

          sorry, I forgot to attach script. Now it's attached. Script expects netxmsd to be in your PATH. If it is not, change 'netxmsd' in script's second line to full path to netxmsd.

          On Centos you likely build NetXMS from sources - then debug information is embedded into binaries. You only have to install gdb package if not installed already:

          yum install gdb

          Best regards,
          Victor


          capture_netxmsd_threads.sh

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C
            C
            clifford
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            Hi Victor,

            Please find the attached scripts output for your reference.

            Best Regards
            Clifford


            netxmsd-threads.22359.7z

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • V
              V
              Victor Kirhenshtein
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Are you sure that CPU usage was high when you capture this dump? I see lot of locks inside (that could be an indicator of another problem) but cannot find anything that can cause high CPU load.

              Best regards,
              Victor

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V
                V
                Victor Kirhenshtein
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                Just found the place. Seems that server enters infinite loop deep within libz (compression library). Check if new version is available. Also, you can try to rebuild server with configure option --with-internal-zlib.

                Best regards,
                Victor

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C
                  C
                  clifford
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  Hi Victor,

                  I rebuild the server with-zlib option but situation is same. after few minutes CPU goes high. I have captured the threads with script which you had shared earlier. Please find the attached screenshot with thread output files.

                  Thank you
                  Clifford.


                  DCI Error.JPG

                  Show threads.JPG

                  netxmsd-threads.1100.7z

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • V
                    V
                    Victor Kirhenshtein
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    It hangs in same place. It looks like zlib bug, for deeper debugging we need actual data being compressed. As a workaround you can try to disable NXCP compression for client sessions by commenting out lines 1894 and 1895 (should looks like

                                m_dwFlags |= CSF_COMPRESSION_ENABLED;
                                msg.setField(VID_ENABLE_COMPRESSION, true);
                    

                    in src/server/core/session.cpp and recompile server.

                    Best regards,
                    Victor

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C
                      C
                      clifford
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Hi Victor,

                      I check  in src/server/core/session.cpp line 1894 abd 1895 are already commented out. Please find the attached snapshot.


                      session.JPG

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • V
                        V
                        Victor Kirhenshtein
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        No, they are not. Put // in front of each line.

                        Best regards,
                        Victor

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C
                          C
                          clifford
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          Hi Victor,

                          I recompiled after commenting out the 2 lines as suggested. However the problem remains the same.
                          Actually we have 2 different Servers for which we recently upgraded from 2.2.5 to 2.2.7 one of these server is running fine after upgrade. Issue is with only this Server, earlier this Server was working Good.

                          Thank you
                          Clifford

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C
                            C
                            clifford
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            Hello Victor,

                            Any update regarding the issue which we are facing?

                            Thanks
                            Clifford.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Z
                              Z
                              Tatjana Dubrovica
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              What is difference between servers? Number of nodes, different OS?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C
                                C
                                clifford
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                Hi Tatjana,

                                Both Servers are Virtual with same configuration and OS (Centos 7). Please see the node stats of both Server below.

                                Server with issue:

                                NetXMS Server Remote Console V2.2.7 Ready
                                Enter "help" for command list

                                netxmsd: show stats
                                Objects............ 35197
                                Monitored nodes.... 1122
                                Collectible DCIs... 2146
                                Active alarms...... 416

                                Server working fine:

                                NetXMS Server Remote Console V2.2.7 Ready
                                Enter "help" for command list

                                netxmsd: show stats
                                Objects............ 32410
                                Monitored nodes.... 853
                                Collectible DCIs... 288
                                Active alarms...... 232

                                Thanks
                                Clifford

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Z
                                  Z
                                  Tatjana Dubrovica
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #24

                                  Looks like you have really a lot of object updates and server is unable to delivere all updates to the client so everything just stuck. I'll rework object update messages, but can't promise the release number where it will get in.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C
                                    C
                                    clifford
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #25

                                    Hi

                                    I didn't get the "server is unable to deliver all updates to the client" part, cause almost all objects are switches and routers, so all we expect from the NMS is to report when the node or link is down. so all of it is SNMP Queries to the clients to check for update status

                                    also it is important for me to view the link status as in my below query

                                    https://www.netxms.org/forum/configuration/unable-to-get-bandwidth-details-on-map/msg23166/#msg23166

                                    hope this gets implemented, it would be the greatest thing for me,

                                    My NMS would be super complete 🙂

                                    Regards
                                    Clifford

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • T
                                      T
                                      Tursiops
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #26

                                      I believe Tatjana means updates to be sent from the server to the Management Console (client), i.e. either the server can't send new information to the client fast enough or the client can't accept it fast enough, thus throttling the server. Once that happens, the queue of updates to send just keeps increasing as it cannot catch up. It'll probably do that until the server runs out of resources and trips over - or until the console is closed. The latter explains why your server performance came good whenever you closed the console.

                                      Have you considered using the Web Console for testing (sry, we're using Ubuntu, so can't give any guidance on the CentOS process)?
                                      As that can be installed on the server itself, it would effectively remove the network from the server to console communication.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C
                                        C
                                        clifford
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #27

                                        Hi

                                        Cool! i'll try the web console

                                        was wondering will shifting to ubuntu help?

                                        Regards

                                        Clifford Dsouza

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T
                                          T
                                          Tursiops
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #28

                                          I haven't run a NetXMS server on anything other than Ubuntu, so I really can't tell if this is any better/worse than the other options out there.
                                          One of our reasons for using Ubuntu (other than personal preference) was the availability of NetXMS packages directly from the developers.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups