Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. NetXMS CPU Usage High

NetXMS CPU Usage High

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
34 Posts 4 Posters 290.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C
    C
    clifford
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Hi Victor

    thanks for ur reply, i need clarity on the 3rd point

    1. Capture threads using attached script (you should have gdb and all relevant netxms-*-dbg packages installed
      how do i verify i have gdb and dbg packages installed , i did the standard netxms install on centos 7.

    beside that i dont see any attached scripts, and an example how to capture the threads

    Regards

    Clifford

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • V
      V
      Victor Kirhenshtein
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Hi,

      sorry, I forgot to attach script. Now it's attached. Script expects netxmsd to be in your PATH. If it is not, change 'netxmsd' in script's second line to full path to netxmsd.

      On Centos you likely build NetXMS from sources - then debug information is embedded into binaries. You only have to install gdb package if not installed already:

      yum install gdb

      Best regards,
      Victor


      capture_netxmsd_threads.sh

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C
        C
        clifford
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Hi Victor,

        Please find the attached scripts output for your reference.

        Best Regards
        Clifford


        netxmsd-threads.22359.7z

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • V
          V
          Victor Kirhenshtein
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Are you sure that CPU usage was high when you capture this dump? I see lot of locks inside (that could be an indicator of another problem) but cannot find anything that can cause high CPU load.

          Best regards,
          Victor

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • V
            V
            Victor Kirhenshtein
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Just found the place. Seems that server enters infinite loop deep within libz (compression library). Check if new version is available. Also, you can try to rebuild server with configure option --with-internal-zlib.

            Best regards,
            Victor

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C
              C
              clifford
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              Hi Victor,

              I rebuild the server with-zlib option but situation is same. after few minutes CPU goes high. I have captured the threads with script which you had shared earlier. Please find the attached screenshot with thread output files.

              Thank you
              Clifford.


              DCI Error.JPG

              Show threads.JPG

              netxmsd-threads.1100.7z

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • V
                V
                Victor Kirhenshtein
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                It hangs in same place. It looks like zlib bug, for deeper debugging we need actual data being compressed. As a workaround you can try to disable NXCP compression for client sessions by commenting out lines 1894 and 1895 (should looks like

                            m_dwFlags |= CSF_COMPRESSION_ENABLED;
                            msg.setField(VID_ENABLE_COMPRESSION, true);
                

                in src/server/core/session.cpp and recompile server.

                Best regards,
                Victor

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C
                  C
                  clifford
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Hi Victor,

                  I check  in src/server/core/session.cpp line 1894 abd 1895 are already commented out. Please find the attached snapshot.


                  session.JPG

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • V
                    V
                    Victor Kirhenshtein
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    No, they are not. Put // in front of each line.

                    Best regards,
                    Victor

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C
                      C
                      clifford
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Hi Victor,

                      I recompiled after commenting out the 2 lines as suggested. However the problem remains the same.
                      Actually we have 2 different Servers for which we recently upgraded from 2.2.5 to 2.2.7 one of these server is running fine after upgrade. Issue is with only this Server, earlier this Server was working Good.

                      Thank you
                      Clifford

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C
                        C
                        clifford
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        Hello Victor,

                        Any update regarding the issue which we are facing?

                        Thanks
                        Clifford.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Z
                          Z
                          Tatjana Dubrovica
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          What is difference between servers? Number of nodes, different OS?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C
                            C
                            clifford
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            Hi Tatjana,

                            Both Servers are Virtual with same configuration and OS (Centos 7). Please see the node stats of both Server below.

                            Server with issue:

                            NetXMS Server Remote Console V2.2.7 Ready
                            Enter "help" for command list

                            netxmsd: show stats
                            Objects............ 35197
                            Monitored nodes.... 1122
                            Collectible DCIs... 2146
                            Active alarms...... 416

                            Server working fine:

                            NetXMS Server Remote Console V2.2.7 Ready
                            Enter "help" for command list

                            netxmsd: show stats
                            Objects............ 32410
                            Monitored nodes.... 853
                            Collectible DCIs... 288
                            Active alarms...... 232

                            Thanks
                            Clifford

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Z
                              Z
                              Tatjana Dubrovica
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              Looks like you have really a lot of object updates and server is unable to delivere all updates to the client so everything just stuck. I'll rework object update messages, but can't promise the release number where it will get in.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C
                                C
                                clifford
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                Hi

                                I didn't get the "server is unable to deliver all updates to the client" part, cause almost all objects are switches and routers, so all we expect from the NMS is to report when the node or link is down. so all of it is SNMP Queries to the clients to check for update status

                                also it is important for me to view the link status as in my below query

                                https://www.netxms.org/forum/configuration/unable-to-get-bandwidth-details-on-map/msg23166/#msg23166

                                hope this gets implemented, it would be the greatest thing for me,

                                My NMS would be super complete 🙂

                                Regards
                                Clifford

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • T
                                  T
                                  Tursiops
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  I believe Tatjana means updates to be sent from the server to the Management Console (client), i.e. either the server can't send new information to the client fast enough or the client can't accept it fast enough, thus throttling the server. Once that happens, the queue of updates to send just keeps increasing as it cannot catch up. It'll probably do that until the server runs out of resources and trips over - or until the console is closed. The latter explains why your server performance came good whenever you closed the console.

                                  Have you considered using the Web Console for testing (sry, we're using Ubuntu, so can't give any guidance on the CentOS process)?
                                  As that can be installed on the server itself, it would effectively remove the network from the server to console communication.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C
                                    C
                                    clifford
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    Hi

                                    Cool! i'll try the web console

                                    was wondering will shifting to ubuntu help?

                                    Regards

                                    Clifford Dsouza

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • T
                                      T
                                      Tursiops
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      I haven't run a NetXMS server on anything other than Ubuntu, so I really can't tell if this is any better/worse than the other options out there.
                                      One of our reasons for using Ubuntu (other than personal preference) was the availability of NetXMS packages directly from the developers.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C
                                        C
                                        clifford
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        Hi,

                                        We have just upgraded Netxms  Server to 2.2.8, now the response seems normal from Management console however CPU utilization is showing 300% and above, below are the stats after the upgrade. Just wanted to know if it is normal.

                                        NetXMS Server Remote Console V2.2.8 Ready
                                        Enter "help" for command list

                                        netxmsd: show threads
                                        MAIN
                                          Threads.............. 256 (8/256)
                                          Load average......... 7838118.55 7292039.09 5187107.27
                                          Current load......... 3084405%
                                          Usage................ 100%
                                          Active requests...... 7896078
                                          Scheduled requests... 0
                                          Total requests....... 12741590
                                          Thread starts........ 248
                                          Thread stops......... 0
                                          Average wait time.... 1641274 ms

                                        POLLERS
                                          Threads.............. 250 (10/250)
                                          Load average......... 103.76 109.10 117.88
                                          Current load......... 83%
                                          Usage................ 100%
                                          Active requests...... 208
                                          Scheduled requests... 0
                                          Total requests....... 30786539
                                          Thread starts........ 240
                                          Thread stops......... 0
                                          Average wait time.... 221 ms

                                        DATACOLL
                                          Threads.............. 96 (10/250)
                                          Load average......... 4.58 5.48 5.53
                                          Current load......... 1%
                                          Usage................ 38%
                                          Active requests...... 1
                                          Scheduled requests... 0
                                          Total requests....... 17575738
                                          Thread starts........ 382
                                          Thread stops......... 296
                                          Average wait time.... 0 ms

                                        SCHEDULER
                                          Threads.............. 1 (1/64)
                                          Load average......... 0.00 0.00 0.00
                                          Current load......... 0%
                                          Usage................ 1%
                                          Active requests...... 0
                                          Scheduled requests... 0
                                          Total requests....... 1750
                                          Thread starts........ 0
                                          Thread stops......... 0
                                          Average wait time.... 0 ms

                                        AGENT
                                          Threads.............. 4 (4/256)
                                          Load average......... 0.00 0.00 0.00
                                          Current load......... 0%
                                          Usage................ 1%
                                          Active requests...... 0
                                          Scheduled requests... 0
                                          Total requests....... 0
                                          Thread starts........ 0
                                          Thread stops......... 0
                                          Average wait time.... 0 ms

                                        CLIENT
                                          Threads.............. 16 (16/512)
                                          Load average......... 0.00 0.00 0.00
                                          Current load......... 0%
                                          Usage................ 3%
                                          Active requests...... 0
                                          Scheduled requests... 0
                                          Total requests....... 4586
                                          Thread starts........ 0
                                          Thread stops......... 0
                                          Average wait time.... 0 ms

                                        Thank you
                                        Clifford.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • V
                                          V
                                          Victor Kirhenshtein
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #30

                                          Hi,

                                          load on thread pool MAIN is definitely not normal. Could you please capture thread stack traces using attached script (you will need gdb installed)?

                                          Best regards,
                                          Victor


                                          capture_netxmsd_threads.sh

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups