Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Flatly)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

NetXMS Forum

  1. Home
  2. Support
  3. NetXMS CPU Usage High

NetXMS CPU Usage High

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Support
34 Posts 4 Posters 290.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V
    V
    Victor Kirhenshtein
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Hi,

    sorry, I forgot to attach script. Now it's attached. Script expects netxmsd to be in your PATH. If it is not, change 'netxmsd' in script's second line to full path to netxmsd.

    On Centos you likely build NetXMS from sources - then debug information is embedded into binaries. You only have to install gdb package if not installed already:

    yum install gdb

    Best regards,
    Victor


    capture_netxmsd_threads.sh

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C
      C
      clifford
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      Hi Victor,

      Please find the attached scripts output for your reference.

      Best Regards
      Clifford


      netxmsd-threads.22359.7z

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • V
        V
        Victor Kirhenshtein
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        Are you sure that CPU usage was high when you capture this dump? I see lot of locks inside (that could be an indicator of another problem) but cannot find anything that can cause high CPU load.

        Best regards,
        Victor

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • V
          V
          Victor Kirhenshtein
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          Just found the place. Seems that server enters infinite loop deep within libz (compression library). Check if new version is available. Also, you can try to rebuild server with configure option --with-internal-zlib.

          Best regards,
          Victor

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C
            C
            clifford
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Hi Victor,

            I rebuild the server with-zlib option but situation is same. after few minutes CPU goes high. I have captured the threads with script which you had shared earlier. Please find the attached screenshot with thread output files.

            Thank you
            Clifford.


            DCI Error.JPG

            Show threads.JPG

            netxmsd-threads.1100.7z

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • V
              V
              Victor Kirhenshtein
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              It hangs in same place. It looks like zlib bug, for deeper debugging we need actual data being compressed. As a workaround you can try to disable NXCP compression for client sessions by commenting out lines 1894 and 1895 (should looks like

                          m_dwFlags |= CSF_COMPRESSION_ENABLED;
                          msg.setField(VID_ENABLE_COMPRESSION, true);
              

              in src/server/core/session.cpp and recompile server.

              Best regards,
              Victor

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C
                C
                clifford
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                Hi Victor,

                I check  in src/server/core/session.cpp line 1894 abd 1895 are already commented out. Please find the attached snapshot.


                session.JPG

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • V
                  V
                  Victor Kirhenshtein
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  No, they are not. Put // in front of each line.

                  Best regards,
                  Victor

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C
                    C
                    clifford
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    Hi Victor,

                    I recompiled after commenting out the 2 lines as suggested. However the problem remains the same.
                    Actually we have 2 different Servers for which we recently upgraded from 2.2.5 to 2.2.7 one of these server is running fine after upgrade. Issue is with only this Server, earlier this Server was working Good.

                    Thank you
                    Clifford

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C
                      C
                      clifford
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      Hello Victor,

                      Any update regarding the issue which we are facing?

                      Thanks
                      Clifford.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Z
                        Z
                        Tatjana Dubrovica
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        What is difference between servers? Number of nodes, different OS?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C
                          C
                          clifford
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          Hi Tatjana,

                          Both Servers are Virtual with same configuration and OS (Centos 7). Please see the node stats of both Server below.

                          Server with issue:

                          NetXMS Server Remote Console V2.2.7 Ready
                          Enter "help" for command list

                          netxmsd: show stats
                          Objects............ 35197
                          Monitored nodes.... 1122
                          Collectible DCIs... 2146
                          Active alarms...... 416

                          Server working fine:

                          NetXMS Server Remote Console V2.2.7 Ready
                          Enter "help" for command list

                          netxmsd: show stats
                          Objects............ 32410
                          Monitored nodes.... 853
                          Collectible DCIs... 288
                          Active alarms...... 232

                          Thanks
                          Clifford

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Z
                            Z
                            Tatjana Dubrovica
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            Looks like you have really a lot of object updates and server is unable to delivere all updates to the client so everything just stuck. I'll rework object update messages, but can't promise the release number where it will get in.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C
                              C
                              clifford
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              Hi

                              I didn't get the "server is unable to deliver all updates to the client" part, cause almost all objects are switches and routers, so all we expect from the NMS is to report when the node or link is down. so all of it is SNMP Queries to the clients to check for update status

                              also it is important for me to view the link status as in my below query

                              https://www.netxms.org/forum/configuration/unable-to-get-bandwidth-details-on-map/msg23166/#msg23166

                              hope this gets implemented, it would be the greatest thing for me,

                              My NMS would be super complete 🙂

                              Regards
                              Clifford

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T
                                T
                                Tursiops
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                I believe Tatjana means updates to be sent from the server to the Management Console (client), i.e. either the server can't send new information to the client fast enough or the client can't accept it fast enough, thus throttling the server. Once that happens, the queue of updates to send just keeps increasing as it cannot catch up. It'll probably do that until the server runs out of resources and trips over - or until the console is closed. The latter explains why your server performance came good whenever you closed the console.

                                Have you considered using the Web Console for testing (sry, we're using Ubuntu, so can't give any guidance on the CentOS process)?
                                As that can be installed on the server itself, it would effectively remove the network from the server to console communication.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C
                                  C
                                  clifford
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  Hi

                                  Cool! i'll try the web console

                                  was wondering will shifting to ubuntu help?

                                  Regards

                                  Clifford Dsouza

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T
                                    T
                                    Tursiops
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    I haven't run a NetXMS server on anything other than Ubuntu, so I really can't tell if this is any better/worse than the other options out there.
                                    One of our reasons for using Ubuntu (other than personal preference) was the availability of NetXMS packages directly from the developers.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C
                                      C
                                      clifford
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #29

                                      Hi,

                                      We have just upgraded Netxms  Server to 2.2.8, now the response seems normal from Management console however CPU utilization is showing 300% and above, below are the stats after the upgrade. Just wanted to know if it is normal.

                                      NetXMS Server Remote Console V2.2.8 Ready
                                      Enter "help" for command list

                                      netxmsd: show threads
                                      MAIN
                                        Threads.............. 256 (8/256)
                                        Load average......... 7838118.55 7292039.09 5187107.27
                                        Current load......... 3084405%
                                        Usage................ 100%
                                        Active requests...... 7896078
                                        Scheduled requests... 0
                                        Total requests....... 12741590
                                        Thread starts........ 248
                                        Thread stops......... 0
                                        Average wait time.... 1641274 ms

                                      POLLERS
                                        Threads.............. 250 (10/250)
                                        Load average......... 103.76 109.10 117.88
                                        Current load......... 83%
                                        Usage................ 100%
                                        Active requests...... 208
                                        Scheduled requests... 0
                                        Total requests....... 30786539
                                        Thread starts........ 240
                                        Thread stops......... 0
                                        Average wait time.... 221 ms

                                      DATACOLL
                                        Threads.............. 96 (10/250)
                                        Load average......... 4.58 5.48 5.53
                                        Current load......... 1%
                                        Usage................ 38%
                                        Active requests...... 1
                                        Scheduled requests... 0
                                        Total requests....... 17575738
                                        Thread starts........ 382
                                        Thread stops......... 296
                                        Average wait time.... 0 ms

                                      SCHEDULER
                                        Threads.............. 1 (1/64)
                                        Load average......... 0.00 0.00 0.00
                                        Current load......... 0%
                                        Usage................ 1%
                                        Active requests...... 0
                                        Scheduled requests... 0
                                        Total requests....... 1750
                                        Thread starts........ 0
                                        Thread stops......... 0
                                        Average wait time.... 0 ms

                                      AGENT
                                        Threads.............. 4 (4/256)
                                        Load average......... 0.00 0.00 0.00
                                        Current load......... 0%
                                        Usage................ 1%
                                        Active requests...... 0
                                        Scheduled requests... 0
                                        Total requests....... 0
                                        Thread starts........ 0
                                        Thread stops......... 0
                                        Average wait time.... 0 ms

                                      CLIENT
                                        Threads.............. 16 (16/512)
                                        Load average......... 0.00 0.00 0.00
                                        Current load......... 0%
                                        Usage................ 3%
                                        Active requests...... 0
                                        Scheduled requests... 0
                                        Total requests....... 4586
                                        Thread starts........ 0
                                        Thread stops......... 0
                                        Average wait time.... 0 ms

                                      Thank you
                                      Clifford.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • V
                                        V
                                        Victor Kirhenshtein
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        Hi,

                                        load on thread pool MAIN is definitely not normal. Could you please capture thread stack traces using attached script (you will need gdb installed)?

                                        Best regards,
                                        Victor


                                        capture_netxmsd_threads.sh

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C
                                          C
                                          clifford
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #31

                                          Hi,

                                          Please find the output of script attached for your reference.

                                          Thanks
                                          Clifford


                                          netxmsd-threads.13495.20180910-141612

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups